XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, alt.fan.art-bell, alt.fucknozzles
XPost: rec.arts.poems, alt.fluff-girl.pinku-sensei
From: thisemail@isamunge.com
On 3/6/09 2:02 PM, in article
paadnW0mGsgR7izUnZ2dnUVZ_oWWnZ2d@centurytel.net, "John "C"" wrote:
>
> "MillerT" wrote in message
> news:gorl5d$8v4$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>> On 3/6/09 11:44 AM, in article 2ko9e7.6rm.17.1@news.alt.net, "Gregory
> Hall"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Although the AUK "Kook" Awards exist primarily to interfere with subscriber
>>> efforts to deal with the relevant facts, I've composed this post to speak a
>>> language of reconciliation, not retaliation. As a preliminary, let me state
>>> that is my desire work together with the award caballers in an atmosphere
of
>>> friendship, change and hope. Call me the Obama of AUK.
>>>
>>> Don't get me wrong, though. As I've stated before, by allowing the AUK
>>> "Kook" Awards to diminish the free speech rights of certain individuals
whom
>>> only the AUK "Kook" Award-givers perceive as "Kooky" we 'upper crust'
>>> subscribers are selling our souls for a pittance. Instead, we should be
>>> striving to evaluate and understand the tactics the Caballers have used
>>> against us the targeted (because of our perceptive normalcy) individuals.
>>> Certainly, the AUK "Kook" Awards caballers truly believe that any halfway
>>> plausible excuse is a satisfactory substitute for performance which
>>> performance has been totally lacking during the month of February as Atlas
>>> Bugged seems to have a core group of libelous caballers on the run and in
>>> exile.
>>
>> I haven't noticed the awards "chilling" anyone's free speech. It certainly
>> hasn't stopped you or your buddies from expressing yourselves.
>
>
> * * One point for the AUK "Talking-Head"...
>
>
>>>
>>> It's just so transparent that a disingenuous and conspiratorial cabal of
>>> creepy and argumentative, hostile, megalomaniacal, soporific, lawless dupes
>>> who display a base, community college, pseudo-intellectual, liberal
>>> aberrancy that stirs in the black hearts of all AUK "Kook" Awards
>>> nominators, seconders, and voters who use scapegoating as a foil to draw
>>> anger away from more accurate targets are obsessed and addicted beyond
>>> reason and consequently unable to see their folly.
>>>
>> Now, would Obama say that? So much for diplomacy, eh?
>>
>
>
> * * He might say it to his wife just before orgasm......
>
>
>
>>>
>>> Can we just simply sweep this all under the rug? We cannot! We ignore AUK
>>> "Kook" Awards at our own peril. Think I'm exaggerating?
>>>
>> Uhm, yes.
>
>
> * * Seemingly honest answer from AUK "Talking-Head".......
>
>
>
>>> Just ask any of the most valuable members of the targeted, erudite
community
>>> and we'll all tell you how if any of us were to become dictator of AUK,
>>>
>> There is no dictator of AUK, nor will there ever be.
>
>
> * * LIAR...LIAR...LIAR...Pants On Fire !!!!
I've never been told what to think, write or do.
>
>>> our first act of business would be to build bi-partisan bridges where in
the
>>> past all that existed were moats and bogs. We would further use our
position
>>> to inform certain segments of the Usenet's population that if it weren't
for
>>> a growing number of homosexual, transsexual, metro sexual and pedophiliac
>>> liberal scum and DataBasux users the AUK "Kook" Awards would have few
>>> friends. This is a shame as proper-administered AUK awards propagated in
the
>>> original spirit of fun would be an asset instead of the mean-spirited
>>> liability it has become in the hands of vindictive people.
>>>
>> I think you take it all too seriously.
>
>
>
> * * "Just following orders" nazi answer from AUK "Talking-Head"....
You have seriously fucked up the paragraph wraps.
No orders; this is my own opinion. Some people may wish I'd just ignored
both of you.
>
>>>
>>> Day by day, thanks to the efforts of Atlas Bugged and his friends the truth
>>> is being impressed upon us that the AUK "Kook" Awarder's humorless
>>> platitudes are merely a distraction. They serve primarily to generate more
>>> self-serving awards piled atop a crumbling foundation of past awards which
>>> were all built on shifting sand dunes by inept architects - tawdry
>>> showpieces existing to prop up egomaniacal Usenet talking heads, by
>>> engendering more punditry from malicious folks. Meanwhile, AUK "Kook"
Awards
>>> drones are continuing their mean-spirited work of advancing the AUK 'Kook"
>>> Awards real goal, which is to criticize other people's beliefs, politics,
>>> businesses and lifestyle and to marginalize their aspirations. This when
the
>>> original intent was to poke fun along the lines of a 'roast.'
>>>
>> Criticism is fair commentary, protected by the First Amendment. Note that
you
>> are engaging in it in every counter-point you write.
>
>
>
> * * Correct, point given back....
Post-editing noted.
>
>>>
>>> It's my personal opinion, based on months of observation, that the AUK
>>> "Kook" Awards administration claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly
>>> after getting caught red-handed trying to smear and damage a respected law
>>> firm but this is too little, too late - this half-hearted and forced
>>> (probably by counsel) silence. This turning over a new leaf under duress is
>>> an outright lie that is now being circulated by AUK 'Kook" Awards' acolytes
>>> who, as typifies liberals, are totally hypocritical and obvious. The truth
>>> is that whenever there's an argument about the AUK "Kook" Awards' devotion
>>> to principles and to freedom, all one has to do is point out that AUK
'Kook"
>>> Awards' ability to reason from premise to conclusion is nearly
non-existent.
>>> That should settle the argument pretty quickly. If it takes more than that
>>> do visit the Kookpedia website and the method to the madness sticks out
like
>>> a sore thumb via crass repetition. In typical liberal fashion they are out
>>> to destroy any and all detractors.
>>
>> You are erroneously assuming someone controls the denizens of AUK; my
>> observation has been that they are all free agents.
>
>
> * * Correct, all AUKers are complete "Fuck-Heads" and worthless !!
>
>
>
>
>>>
>>> The AUK "Kook" Awarders seem to have no trouble sweet-talking what I call
>>> cancerous caballers into helping it harvest what others have sown. While
>>> riding on the backs of those the caballers belittle, these losers actually
>>> think they are the ones pulling the load. This is the flaw in the AUKer
>>> campaigns of malice and malignity. They don't understand this is
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
