XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, alt.fan.art-bell, alt.fucknozzles
XPost: rec.arts.poems, alt.fluff-girl.pinku-sensei
From: nimue@databasix.com
John "C" wrote:
> "Marcia" wrote in message
> news:C5DFCCE0.16BC6%what@wherever.com...
>> in article 2l91pv.igb.17.3@news.alt.net, Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries at
>> nimue@databasix.com wrote on 3/12/09 9:01 PM:
>>
>>> Marcia wrote:
>>>> in article 2l8vtm.ac0.17.2@news.alt.net, Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries at
>>>> nimue@databasix.com wrote on 3/12/09 8:18 PM:
>>>>
>>>>> marcia wrote:
>>>>>> On Mar 12, 7:52 pm, Dead Kitten
>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> marcia wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mar 12, 7:13 pm, Dead Kitten
>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> marcia wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 12, 6:38 pm, Dead Kitten
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> marcia wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 12, 6:27 pm, Dead Kitten
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Marcia wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought the copy & paste issue was resolved in Barrett
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> v. Rosenthal, as an application of Section 230 of The
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Communications Decency Act. * Barrett v. Rosenthal, 40
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cal. 4th 33 (2006)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Immunity was upheld for an individual internet user from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> liability for republication of defamatory statement on a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> listserv. The court found the defendant to be a "user of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interactive computer services" and thus immune from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> liability for posting information passed to her by the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> author.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And here we have ANOTHER e-attorney.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> My, my. Who would have guessed that AUK had so many law
>>>>>>>>>>>>> experts.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Disprove what I've written
>>>>>>>>>>> You aren't an attorney, therefore all your legal "advice" is
>>>>>>>>>>> pure shit. Hope that helps!
>>>>>>>>>> I researched it
>>>>>>>>> Yes, I'm sure your Wikipedia and Google skills are very
>>>>>>>>> powerful, but that doesn't make you an attorney.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I researched it
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Repeating yourself isn't going to help.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Prove me wrong, dumbass.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Prove that you're an attorney. Until you do, you are wrong by
>>>>>>> default.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> False assumption, retard. Can you prove the facts wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>> He'll do this as long as you keep arguing with him.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you stop, he'll do something else.
>>>>>
>>>>> IOW, you are being trolled. It's meaningless.
>>>>
>>>> I was just copying spooge. :)
>>>
>>> Well, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, but I've noticed
>>> that Aratzio doesn't like it when Mike imitates him.
>>
>> I really wish everyone would just kiss and make up. Or get along, at
>> least.
>>
>> ISTM all the parties involved in this particular *ahem* "problem"
>> are really decent people who hold a lot of the same values and
>> philosophies, but can't seem to get past some nasty incidents.
>
> That's the goal of the "New AUK" ...a Nice place to post...free of
> back-biting and other such behavior...I'm glad that you're "On-Board"
> !!
I don't see a difference. Moreover, I don't expect to see a difference
in days to come.
All I see is a control-freak trying to "win" at any cost, blindly,
without any regard for consequences.
And for that particular control-freak, all I see is a very bad end.
I would suggest to you that while it may be fun right now, it is not
going to stay that way. Then again, I'm pretty sure you already know
that.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
"You know you can indict a ham sandwich if you want to."
William J. Martini, Judge, United States District Court
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
