XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, alt.fan.art-bell, alt.fucknozzles   
   XPost: rec.arts.poems, alt.fluff-girl.pinku-sensei   
   From: thisemail@isamunge.com   
      
   On 3/13/09 3:23 PM, in article   
   ONWdnRiqXa4FOSfUnZ2dnUVZ_j-WnZ2d@centurytel.net, "John "C"" wrote:   
      
   >   
   > "MillerT"  wrote in message   
   > news:gpdq7t$kcq$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   >> On 3/13/09 11:02 AM, in article   
   >> eIOdnWC7Ep3E-ifUnZ2dnUVZ_r3inZ2d@centurytel.net, "John "C"" wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> "Marcia"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:C5DFCCE0.16BC6%what@wherever.com...   
   >>>> in article 2l91pv.igb.17.3@news.alt.net, Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries at   
   >>>> nimue@databasix.com wrote on 3/12/09 9:01 PM:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Marcia wrote:   
   >>>>>> in article 2l8vtm.ac0.17.2@news.alt.net, Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries at   
   >>>>>> nimue@databasix.com wrote on 3/12/09 8:18 PM:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> marcia wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> On Mar 12, 7:52 pm, Dead Kitten   
   >>>    
   >>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> marcia wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Mar 12, 7:13 pm, Dead Kitten   
   >>>    
   >>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> marcia wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 12, 6:38 pm, Dead Kitten   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> marcia wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 12, 6:27 pm, Dead Kitten   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Marcia wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> I thought the copy & paste issue was resolved in Barrett   
   >>> v.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Rosenthal, as an application of Section 230 of The   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Communications Decency Act. * Barrett v. Rosenthal, 40   
   >>> Cal.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> 4th 33 (2006)   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Immunity was upheld for an individual internet user from   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> liability for republication of defamatory statement on a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> listserv. The court found the defendant to be a "user of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> interactive computer services" and thus immune from   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> liability for posting information passed to her by the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> author.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> And here we have ANOTHER e-attorney.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> My, my.  Who would have guessed that AUK had so many law   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> experts.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Disprove what I've written   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> You aren't an attorney, therefore all your legal "advice"   
   > is   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> pure shit. Hope that helps!   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> I researched it   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I'm sure your Wikipedia and Google skills are very   
   >>> powerful,   
   >>>>>>>>>>> but that doesn't make you an attorney.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> I researched it   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Repeating yourself isn't going to help.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Prove me wrong, dumbass.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Prove that you're an attorney.  Until you do, you are wrong by   
   >>>>>>>>> default.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> False assumption, retard. Can you prove the facts wrong?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> He'll do this as long as you keep arguing with him.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> If you stop, he'll do something else.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> IOW, you are being trolled. It's meaningless.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> I was just copying spooge. :)   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Well, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, but I've   
   > noticed   
   >>> that   
   >>>>> Aratzio doesn't like it when Mike imitates him.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I really wish everyone would just kiss and make up. Or get along,   
   > at   
   >>> least.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ISTM all the parties involved in this particular *ahem* "problem"   
   > are   
   >>> really   
   >>>> decent people who hold a lot of the same values and philosophies,   
   > but   
   >>> can't   
   >>>> seem to get past some nasty incidents.   
   >>>   
   >>> That's the goal of the "New AUK" ...a Nice place to post...free of   
   >>> back-biting and other such behavior...I'm glad that you're   
   > "On-Board" !!   
   >>> --   
   >>> King John I of AUK   
   >>   
   >> Pffft. The goal of the self-appointed New AUK committee is to   
   > undermine our   
   >> First Amendment rights and try to act as a dictatorship. Good luck   
   > with   
   >> that. If you want to control people, you'll have to start a moderated   
   >> newsgroup.   
   >   
   > I don't recall making fun of "nerds and newbies" for their ignorance as   
   > to how Usenet operates...   
   >   
   > I do recall telling "haters & Pokers" to take their krap on down the   
   > road......   
      
   I've seen you poke people who weren't bothering anyone, just because they   
   were aligned with the wrong AUKers, or misaligned with your little crew. You   
   may have different standards for harassing people, but they're no better   
   than what you claim the AUK regs do.   
      
   For example, I haven't seen Kali bother anyone, yet you harass her EVERY   
   DAY. Not that she cares, I'm sure, but it's still an undeserved attempt at   
   bullying on your part.   
      
   >   
   > 85% of what was wrong with AUK was the "unfair" elections which have   
   > been stopped because Miss Pinky Sue Lamb has abandoned all of you   
   > because she is truly a Coward...   
      
   OMG. What makes the elections such a big deal?   
      
   Have you ever heard of the Darwin awards? You might want to tell them to   
   stop, too.   
      
   http://www.darwinawards.com/   
   >   
   > Come-on, and just enjoy AUK as a nice group !!   
      
   Oh, nice as in outer-filthing? Calling people fat cows? Filing frivolous   
   lawsuits against a bunch of people who haven't done anything legally wrong?   
   Is that what you consider nice?   
      
   > --   
   > King John I of AUK   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)