XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, alt.fan.art-bell, alt.fucknozzles   
   XPost: rec.arts.poems, alt.fluff-girl.pinku-sensei   
   From: thisemail@isamunge.com   
      
   On 3/15/09 4:51 PM, in article 2lgfah.uql.19.1@news.alt.net, "Gregory Hall"   
   wrote:   
      
   > "MillerT"  wrote in message   
   > news:gpjlk2$l3n$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   >> On 3/15/09 3:05 PM, in article 2lg921.skv.17.1@news.alt.net, "Gregory   
   >> Hall"   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> "MillerT"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:gpjisi$dgm$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   >>>> On 3/15/09 2:36 PM, in article 2lg7cd.r7t.19.1@news.alt.net, "Gregory   
   >>>> Hall"   
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> It's the case that, too often, people attempt to make an argument by   
   >>>>> attacking and insulting those who hold opposing views. I wish to do the   
   >>>>> exact opposite:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ? a certain odious faction that was engaging in systematic abuse of   
   >>>> individuals   
   >>>>   
   >>>> * If you don't share my views you're probably a member of the infamous   
   >>>> 'cabal' of AUK bullies.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ? You abusers are too ignorant to read the writing on the wall.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ? your reign of terror   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ? There are more than a few AUK bullies who deserve their comeuppance in   
   >>>> public where they can be spat upon and pelted with rotten vegetables by   
   >>>> those whom they have abused over the years as they are led out of the   
   >>>> courtroom in shackles.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ? These fools would not hesitate to ridicule, parody, censor, and   
   >>>> downgrade   
   >>>> Atlas's opposing ideas if they felt they could benefit from doing so but   
   >>>> their silence is deafening.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ? As stupid as they are it seems to have gotten through their thick   
   >>>> skulls   
   >>>> to not play with fire anymore.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ? stereotyped as cabalistic tools of a liberal smear machine using   
   >>>> search   
   >>>> and destroy tactics based upon their left-wing political ideology to get   
   >>>> their way.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ? Names such as Rhonda, Miguel, Kali, Aratzio, Spooge, PJR etc. are all   
   >>>> despicable examples of   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ? a thug-run abuse of civil rights factory   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ? Forget it you miscreants!   
   >>>>   
   >>>> ? since you've demonstrated little or no wisdom in the past these words   
   >>>> will   
   >>>> most likely fall on the usual deaf ears   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I count at least twelve examples of you "[making] an argument by   
   >>>> attacking   
   >>>> and insulting those who hold opposing views."   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> It can't be helped. When praising the praiseworthy one must give context   
   >>> or   
   >>> one's argument lacks merit.   
   >>>   
   >>> One cannot talk of slaying the dragon without talking about, in clear,   
   >>> precise terms, the evil and treachery that is the dragon.   
   >>   
   >> Are you saying your opening paragraph was deliberately deceitful? Reread   
   >> your own words:   
   >>   
   >>>> It's the case that, too often, people attempt to make an argument by   
   >>>> attacking and insulting those who hold opposing views. I wish to do the   
   >>>> exact opposite:   
   >>   
   >   
   >   
   > Perhaps you missed it but I was enthusiastic in my praise of Atlas Bugged.   
   > Unfortunately one must necessarily give reason for such praise even if it   
   > involves a realistic appraisal of the enemy.   
      
   I didn't miss the smarmy homage to your hero; my comment is that the body of   
   your essay failed to support the claim in your thesis statement, which makes   
   you appear hypocritical, among other things.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)