XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, alt.fan.art-bell, alt.fucknozzles   
   XPost: rec.arts.poems, alt.fluff-girl.pinku-sensei   
   From: greghall@home.fake   
      
   "MillerT"  wrote in message   
   news:gpjsfe$alt$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   > On 3/15/09 5:35 PM, in article 2lght7.adp.19.1@news.alt.net, "Gregory   
   > Hall"   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   >> "MillerT"  wrote in message   
   >> news:gpjrau$8mo$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   >>> On 3/15/09 4:51 PM, in article 2lgfah.uql.19.1@news.alt.net, "Gregory   
   >>> Hall"   
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> "MillerT"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:gpjlk2$l3n$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   >>>>> On 3/15/09 3:05 PM, in article 2lg921.skv.17.1@news.alt.net, "Gregory   
   >>>>> Hall"   
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> "MillerT"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>> news:gpjisi$dgm$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   >>>>>>> On 3/15/09 2:36 PM, in article 2lg7cd.r7t.19.1@news.alt.net,   
   >>>>>>> "Gregory   
   >>>>>>> Hall"   
   >>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> It's the case that, too often, people attempt to make an argument   
   >>>>>>>> by   
   >>>>>>>> attacking and insulting those who hold opposing views. I wish to do   
   >>>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>>> exact opposite:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> ? a certain odious faction that was engaging in systematic abuse of   
   >>>>>>> individuals   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> * If you don't share my views you're probably a member of the   
   >>>>>>> infamous   
   >>>>>>> 'cabal' of AUK bullies.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> ? You abusers are too ignorant to read the writing on the wall.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> ? your reign of terror   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> ? There are more than a few AUK bullies who deserve their   
   >>>>>>> comeuppance   
   >>>>>>> in   
   >>>>>>> public where they can be spat upon and pelted with rotten vegetables   
   >>>>>>> by   
   >>>>>>> those whom they have abused over the years as they are led out of   
   >>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>> courtroom in shackles.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> ? These fools would not hesitate to ridicule, parody, censor, and   
   >>>>>>> downgrade   
   >>>>>>> Atlas's opposing ideas if they felt they could benefit from doing so   
   >>>>>>> but   
   >>>>>>> their silence is deafening.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> ? As stupid as they are it seems to have gotten through their thick   
   >>>>>>> skulls   
   >>>>>>> to not play with fire anymore.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> ? stereotyped as cabalistic tools of a liberal smear machine using   
   >>>>>>> search   
   >>>>>>> and destroy tactics based upon their left-wing political ideology to   
   >>>>>>> get   
   >>>>>>> their way.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> ? Names such as Rhonda, Miguel, Kali, Aratzio, Spooge, PJR etc. are   
   >>>>>>> all   
   >>>>>>> despicable examples of   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> ? a thug-run abuse of civil rights factory   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> ? Forget it you miscreants!   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> ? since you've demonstrated little or no wisdom in the past these   
   >>>>>>> words   
   >>>>>>> will   
   >>>>>>> most likely fall on the usual deaf ears   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I count at least twelve examples of you "[making] an argument by   
   >>>>>>> attacking   
   >>>>>>> and insulting those who hold opposing views."   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> It can't be helped. When praising the praiseworthy one must give   
   >>>>>> context   
   >>>>>> or   
   >>>>>> one's argument lacks merit.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> One cannot talk of slaying the dragon without talking about, in   
   >>>>>> clear,   
   >>>>>> precise terms, the evil and treachery that is the dragon.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Are you saying your opening paragraph was deliberately deceitful?   
   >>>>> Reread   
   >>>>> your own words:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>> It's the case that, too often, people attempt to make an argument by   
   >>>>>>> attacking and insulting those who hold opposing views. I wish to do   
   >>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>> exact opposite:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Perhaps you missed it but I was enthusiastic in my praise of Atlas   
   >>>> Bugged.   
   >>>> Unfortunately one must necessarily give reason for such praise even if   
   >>>> it   
   >>>> involves a realistic appraisal of the enemy.   
   >>>   
   >>> I didn't miss the smarmy homage to your hero; my comment is that the   
   >>> body   
   >>> of   
   >>> your essay failed to support the claim in your thesis statement, which   
   >>> makes   
   >>> you appear hypocritical, among other things.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Some might call it hypocrisy but I prefer to call it expert trolling. . .   
   >> C'mon now, try spitting out the hook.   
   >   
   > That's the usual claim when one is hoisted by one's own petard.   
   >   
      
   It's "hoist" not "hoisted."  Duh! Talk much?   
      
   --   
   Gregory Hall   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)