XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, alt.fan.art-bell, alt.fucknozzles
XPost: rec.arts.poems, alt.fluff-girl.pinku-sensei
From: greghall@home.fake
"MillerT" wrote in message
news:gpju5m$gne$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> On 3/15/09 5:44 PM, in article 2lgidr.6l9.17.1@news.alt.net, "Gregory
> Hall"
> wrote:
>
>> "MillerT" wrote in message
>> news:gpjsfe$alt$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>>> On 3/15/09 5:35 PM, in article 2lght7.adp.19.1@news.alt.net, "Gregory
>>> Hall"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "MillerT" wrote in message
>>>> news:gpjrau$8mo$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>>>>> On 3/15/09 4:51 PM, in article 2lgfah.uql.19.1@news.alt.net, "Gregory
>>>>> Hall"
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "MillerT" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:gpjlk2$l3n$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>>>>>>> On 3/15/09 3:05 PM, in article 2lg921.skv.17.1@news.alt.net,
>>>>>>> "Gregory
>>>>>>> Hall"
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "MillerT" wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:gpjisi$dgm$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>>>>>>>>> On 3/15/09 2:36 PM, in article 2lg7cd.r7t.19.1@news.alt.net,
>>>>>>>>> "Gregory
>>>>>>>>> Hall"
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's the case that, too often, people attempt to make an argument
>>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>>> attacking and insulting those who hold opposing views. I wish to
>>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> exact opposite:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ? a certain odious faction that was engaging in systematic abuse
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> individuals
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> * If you don't share my views you're probably a member of the
>>>>>>>>> infamous
>>>>>>>>> 'cabal' of AUK bullies.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ? You abusers are too ignorant to read the writing on the wall.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ? your reign of terror
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ? There are more than a few AUK bullies who deserve their
>>>>>>>>> comeuppance
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> public where they can be spat upon and pelted with rotten
>>>>>>>>> vegetables
>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>> those whom they have abused over the years as they are led out of
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> courtroom in shackles.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ? These fools would not hesitate to ridicule, parody, censor, and
>>>>>>>>> downgrade
>>>>>>>>> Atlas's opposing ideas if they felt they could benefit from doing
>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>> their silence is deafening.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ? As stupid as they are it seems to have gotten through their
>>>>>>>>> thick
>>>>>>>>> skulls
>>>>>>>>> to not play with fire anymore.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ? stereotyped as cabalistic tools of a liberal smear machine using
>>>>>>>>> search
>>>>>>>>> and destroy tactics based upon their left-wing political ideology
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>> their way.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ? Names such as Rhonda, Miguel, Kali, Aratzio, Spooge, PJR etc.
>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>> despicable examples of
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ? a thug-run abuse of civil rights factory
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ? Forget it you miscreants!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ? since you've demonstrated little or no wisdom in the past these
>>>>>>>>> words
>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>> most likely fall on the usual deaf ears
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I count at least twelve examples of you "[making] an argument by
>>>>>>>>> attacking
>>>>>>>>> and insulting those who hold opposing views."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It can't be helped. When praising the praiseworthy one must give
>>>>>>>> context
>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>> one's argument lacks merit.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One cannot talk of slaying the dragon without talking about, in
>>>>>>>> clear,
>>>>>>>> precise terms, the evil and treachery that is the dragon.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are you saying your opening paragraph was deliberately deceitful?
>>>>>>> Reread
>>>>>>> your own words:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's the case that, too often, people attempt to make an argument
>>>>>>>>> by
>>>>>>>>> attacking and insulting those who hold opposing views. I wish to
>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> exact opposite:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps you missed it but I was enthusiastic in my praise of Atlas
>>>>>> Bugged.
>>>>>> Unfortunately one must necessarily give reason for such praise even
>>>>>> if
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> involves a realistic appraisal of the enemy.
>>>>>
>>>>> I didn't miss the smarmy homage to your hero; my comment is that the
>>>>> body
>>>>> of
>>>>> your essay failed to support the claim in your thesis statement, which
>>>>> makes
>>>>> you appear hypocritical, among other things.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Some might call it hypocrisy but I prefer to call it expert trolling. .
>>>> .
>>>> C'mon now, try spitting out the hook.
>>>
>>> That's the usual claim when one is hoisted by one's own petard.
>>>
>>
>> It's "hoist" not "hoisted." Duh! Talk much?
>
> Not when used in the past tense, as in the preceding sentence, genius.
>
> "That's the usual claim when one is 'hoist' by one's own petard" is
> grammatically incorrect.
>
> Hoist \Hoist\, v. t. [imp. & p. p. Hoisted; p. pr. & vb. n.
> Hoisting.] [OE. hoise, hyse, OD. hyssen, D. hijshen; akin
> to LG. hissen, Dan. hisse, Sw. hissa.]
> To raise; to lift; to elevate; esp., to raise or lift to a
> desired elevation, by means of tackle, as a sail, a flag, a
> heavy package or weight.
>
> Hoisted: verb, simple past tense.
Bwahhahahahhaha. Wrong!
We are talking OLD English here.
"hoise" is the present tense
"hoist" is the past tense
Happy to be of service.
--
Gregory Hall
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
