XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, alt.fan.art-bell, alt.fucknozzles   
   XPost: rec.arts.poems, alt.fluff-girl.pinku-sensei   
   From: thisemail@isamunge.com   
      
   On 3/15/09 6:55 PM, in article 2lgmid.vsl.19.1@news.alt.net, "Gregory Hall"   
   wrote:   
      
   > "MillerT"  wrote in message   
   > news:gpjvu2$loi$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   >> On 3/15/09 6:15 PM, in article 2lgk66.l34.19.1@news.alt.net, "Gregory   
   >> Hall"   
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> "MillerT"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:gpju5m$gne$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   >>>> On 3/15/09 5:44 PM, in article 2lgidr.6l9.17.1@news.alt.net, "Gregory   
   >>>> Hall"   
   >>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> "MillerT"  wrote in message   
   >>>>> news:gpjsfe$alt$3@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   >>>>>> On 3/15/09 5:35 PM, in article 2lght7.adp.19.1@news.alt.net, "Gregory   
   >>>>>> Hall"   
   >>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> "MillerT"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>> news:gpjrau$8mo$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   >>>>>>>> On 3/15/09 4:51 PM, in article 2lgfah.uql.19.1@news.alt.net,   
   >>>>>>>> "Gregory   
   >>>>>>>> Hall"   
   >>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> "MillerT"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>> news:gpjlk2$l3n$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 3/15/09 3:05 PM, in article 2lg921.skv.17.1@news.alt.net,   
   >>>>>>>>>> "Gregory   
   >>>>>>>>>> Hall"   
   >>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> "MillerT"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>> news:gpjisi$dgm$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/15/09 2:36 PM, in article 2lg7cd.r7t.19.1@news.alt.net,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> "Gregory   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Hall"   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> It's the case that, too often, people attempt to make an   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> argument   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> by   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> attacking and insulting those who hold opposing views. I wish   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> do   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> exact opposite:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> ? a certain odious faction that was engaging in systematic abuse   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> individuals   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> * If you don't share my views you're probably a member of the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> infamous   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> 'cabal' of AUK bullies.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> ? You abusers are too ignorant to read the writing on the wall.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> ? your reign of terror   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> ? There are more than a few AUK bullies who deserve their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> comeuppance   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> public where they can be spat upon and pelted with rotten   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> vegetables   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> by   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> those whom they have abused over the years as they are led out   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> courtroom in shackles.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> ? These fools would not hesitate to ridicule, parody, censor,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> downgrade   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Atlas's opposing ideas if they felt they could benefit from   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> doing   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> so   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> but   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> their silence is deafening.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> ? As stupid as they are it seems to have gotten through their   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> thick   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> skulls   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> to not play with fire anymore.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> ? stereotyped as cabalistic tools of a liberal smear machine   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> using   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> search   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> and destroy tactics based upon their left-wing political   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> ideology   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> get   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> their way.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> ? Names such as Rhonda, Miguel, Kali, Aratzio, Spooge, PJR etc.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> are   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> all   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> despicable examples of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> ? a thug-run abuse of civil rights factory   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> ? Forget it you miscreants!   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> ? since you've demonstrated little or no wisdom in the past   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> these   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> words   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> will   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> most likely fall on the usual deaf ears   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> I count at least twelve examples of you "[making] an argument by   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> attacking   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> and insulting those who hold opposing views."   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> It can't be helped. When praising the praiseworthy one must give   
   >>>>>>>>>>> context   
   >>>>>>>>>>> or   
   >>>>>>>>>>> one's argument lacks merit.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> One cannot talk of slaying the dragon without talking about, in   
   >>>>>>>>>>> clear,   
   >>>>>>>>>>> precise terms, the evil and treachery that is the dragon.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Are you saying your opening paragraph was deliberately deceitful?   
   >>>>>>>>>> Reread   
   >>>>>>>>>> your own words:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> It's the case that, too often, people attempt to make an   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> argument   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> by   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> attacking and insulting those who hold opposing views. I wish to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> do   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> exact opposite:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Perhaps you missed it but I was enthusiastic in my praise of Atlas   
   >>>>>>>>> Bugged.   
   >>>>>>>>> Unfortunately one must necessarily give reason for such praise even   
   >>>>>>>>> if   
   >>>>>>>>> it   
   >>>>>>>>> involves a realistic appraisal of the enemy.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> I didn't miss the smarmy homage to your hero; my comment is that the   
   >>>>>>>> body   
   >>>>>>>> of   
   >>>>>>>> your essay failed to support the claim in your thesis statement,   
   >>>>>>>> which   
   >>>>>>>> makes   
   >>>>>>>> you appear hypocritical, among other things.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Some might call it hypocrisy but I prefer to call it expert trolling.   
   >>>>>>> .   
   >>>>>>> .   
   >>>>>>> C'mon now, try spitting out the hook.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> That's the usual claim when one is hoisted by one's own petard.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> It's "hoist" not "hoisted."  Duh! Talk much?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Not when used in the past tense, as in the preceding sentence, genius.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "That's the usual claim when one is 'hoist' by one's own petard" is   
   >>>> grammatically incorrect.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Hoist \Hoist\, v. t. [imp. & p. p. Hoisted; p. pr. & vb. n.   
   >>>>   Hoisting.] [OE. hoise, hyse, OD. hyssen, D. hijshen; akin   
   >>>>   to LG. hissen, Dan. hisse, Sw. hissa.]   
   >>>>   To raise; to lift; to elevate; esp., to raise or lift to a   
   >>>>   desired elevation, by means of tackle, as a sail, a flag, a   
   >>>>   heavy package or weight.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Hoisted: verb, simple past tense.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> But thanks for the grammar lame... er, lesson.   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Hey, moron, if you repeat a famous quotation you should leave it as   
   >>> originally written:   
   >>   
   >>    
   >>   
   >> Listen, asshat, you should learn to stop before you're too far behind.   
   >>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)