771127bc   
   XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, rec.arts.poems, news.groups   
   From: bobbylarter@gmail.com   
      
   erfc-1024@hotmail.com wrote:   
   > On Apr 18, 5:11 pm, Kali  wrote:   
   >> In article ,   
   >> restaveksanma...@yahoo.com says...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>> On 4/17/09 5:19 PM, in article gsarmr$3d...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com,   
   >>> "Kali"  wrote:   
   >>>> In article ,   
   >>>> restaveksanma...@yahoo.com says...   
   >>>>> On 4/16/09 9:53 PM, in article gs8nd3$97...@blackhelicopte   
   .databasix.com,   
   >>>>> "Kali"  wrote:   
   >>>>>> But your issues, other than the suspicions you have about Cujo,   
   >>>>>> aren't with aukers. I and my friends who post to auk are not   
   >>>>>> heartless, cruel, people.   
   >>>>> Suppose a number of people at your daughters' school decided to set up a   
   >>>>> "Kali's Daughter is a Kook" webpage, complete with disparaging comments   
   >>>>> about her appearance, her personal hygiene, her sexual habits and her   
   mental   
   >>>>> state.  Suppose they followed her around various forums responding to   
   >>>>> everything she posted with "STFU skank" and the like along with links to   
   >>>>> that page.   Would you think of them as heartless and cruel?   
   >>>> I would think they are idiots with no life, and so would my   
   >>>> daughter. I would take issue with their behavior, instead of   
   >>>> criticizing their target.   
   >>> But yet you feel the need to make excuses for your friends when they engage   
   >>> in exactly that sort of behavior -- and to join in it.  Does that make you   
   >>> feel powerful? Do you get a visceral thrill out of playing "make the kook   
   >>> foam at the mouth?" games? What's the attraction?   
   >> Examples, threads? I just don't recall crossing any lines, myself.   
   >>   
   >>> Ehrenfels is a windbag, but he made a few good points about the motivations   
   >>> and behaviors of your little crew.  So have others. Yet you continue to   
   deny   
   >>> them: you would rather identify with the abuser than the abused,  I guess.   
   >>> Not all that surprising, really, given your history.   
   >> Psychoanalytic bullpucky. Worth every dime you paid for it. You   
   >> obviously aren't very familiar with that situation, or you'd know   
   >> that I actually defended him on several occasions. He turned on me   
   >> because I questioned his motives in his dealings with graduate   
   >> students. It wasn't a kookology thing, it was a group/topical   
   >> debate.   
   >>   
   >>>> Your turn to share about your children, now. Yes, no? Why not? You   
   >>>> obviously believe it's fair game.   
   >>> No children here, by choice.   
   >> That's not the point. Or maybe it makes you insensitive to the   
   >> issue.   
   >>   
   >>   I've got a few pets but I doubt they'd have a   
   >>   
   >>> lot of interest in anything that could be said here.  If I did have   
   >>> children, I'd be smart enough to refrain from teasing the crazy people: a   
   >>> few decades living in urban environments taught me enough street smarts to   
   >>> learn that teasing mentally ill people   
   >> Point out where I've teased mentally ill people. Or STFU.   
   >   
   > You lying Bitch!   
   >   
   > You teased Honest John for 6 months and you should have known that he   
   > was crazy,   
   >   
   > He even posted that he was crazy and on disability for it!   
      
   Really? When did you post about that, Dishonest John?   
      
   --   
       W   
     . | ,. w ,   "Some people are alive only because   
      \|/  \|/     it is illegal to kill them."    Perna condita delenda est   
   ---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)