cb5a4642
XPost: misc.health.alternative, misc.legal, alt.support.attn-deficit
XPost: alt.support.depression.medication
From: plasticity@yayoo.com
"Linda" wrote in message
news:1de60a40-aa62-4107-966a-160e5d436f72@h37g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
> Plain and simple: I cannot be prevailed upon ...
> I'm already a member of a "group" that's been here for centuries...
fact is, you have been prevailed upon already.
you just don't know it.
and lineage doesn't matter.
if it did, you wouldn't be living hand (out) to mouth.
> > suspicions without more don't amount to proof
> That's what "marcia" and "Frankie Boy"
outing someone who criticizes you doesn't turn your allegations
into credible claims.
god... you are one self-absorbed, stoopid old bag.
> > > > and you're mentally ill, and receiving public assistance.
> > > No
> >
> > your online admissions say otherwise
> No, they don't.
i'm afraid they do.
and no amount of your incessant denials changes that.
> And, if you are banking on the fact that nearly 99% of Americans are
> sucking at the public trough----YOU LOSE, because I'm among the 1% of
> Americans who are not sucking at the public tit.
most Americans don't receive public assistance the way you do.
you do NOT earn your own keep.
tax dollars support you.
> Either, retract the lies your published and/or reinforced to
> manufacture the false perception that I am sucking off the public
> tit, OR, have yourselves named as persons of interest in the
> investigation which I will insist be launched to discover
bring it on.
> > matters little what you think
> It matters a great deal what I think.
no it doesn't.
you're a wart on the crotch of society.
> You reprobates can't induce schizophrenia
no one needs to induce anything.
you do that all on your own.
> you can't do any of the above unless or until you succeed in
> your effort to bamboozle
no one needs to bamboozle.
you do it all on your own.
nothing anyone did is responsible for your posts on usenet.
only you are.
> > > Any legal proceeding
> >
> > will include evidence putting your condition in controversy
> > and on good cause include a motion to have you examined
> > by a licensed examiner
> You can rationalize all you want
rationalization isn't necessary.
just Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35.
> The only way you reprobates can ...
> ... is for you to buy yourselves a judge
> and pay off all my attorneys.
i really hate to disappoint you, but you're just
not that important.
> ... you can't successfully misuse the courts to do
> jacksh*t to me.
misuse isn't required, as if the courts would permit such a thing.
all that's required is a fair presentation of the evidence, which includes,
in part, your history of posting on usenet, along with the
reports of your court-ordered physical / mental examinations.
> > blaming your own inadequacies and failures in life
> > on others goes nowhere.
> >
> > face it: you are a loser.
> Ha!
> One has to "lop off" an awful lot of my identity, if not, everything
> which makes me "me" in order to reach that conclusion.
no one expects you to see yourself as you really are.
you've amply established that you're pathologically deluded.
as such, you're not qualified to judge yourself, or anyone
else, for that matter.
> now have you got anything to contribute to the subject of this
> discussion which is it being high time that Martin E. P. Seligman
if i did, i wouldn't post it here.
you're not qualified to prompt a discussion on Seligman.
your aim is to use such discussions to blame everyone
but yourself for your own failures in life.
folks on usenet see through that.
that's why the number of folks on usenet who
respond positively to your ruse-propaganda
continues to approach zero.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
