XPost: misc.health.alternative, misc.legal, sci.med   
   XPost: alt.government.abuse   
   From: fafa@fafafa.org   
      
   Bob Officer"  wrote in message   
   news:t4i9265bnqj9ka8ee1usoam0vf13iop3ud@4ax.com...   
   > On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 05:08:22 -0400, in misc.health.alternative, "Al   
   > Grimes"  wrote:   
   >   
   >>Linda wrote:   
   >>> On Jun 24, 3:00 pm, "Al Grimes"  wrote:   
   >>>> Linda wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> BTW... your own Senator Harry Reid supports   
   >>>>>>>>> the appointment of General Petraeus to take over   
   >>>>>>>>> the job of fired General McChrystal.   
   >>>>>>>> WTF is your beef with Petraeus???   
   >>>>>>>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _   
   >>>>>>>> Don't have one.   
   >>>>>>> Then, why are you interrogating me about Petraeus---   
   >>>>>> I haven't asked you a single question about Petraeus.   
   >>>>>> I said your own Senator Reid supports Petraeus   
   >>>>>> to replace McChrystal, and I predicted you would   
   >>>>>> find fault with Petraeus in due time.   
   >>>>> You have me confused with those who are unfamiliar with   
   >>>>> Enhanced Interrogation Techniques you are employing.   
   >>>> First, interrogation requires the antecedent condition of having   
   >>>> physical custody of a detainee.   That condition isn't present   
   >>>> in this usenet discussion.   
   >>>   
   >>> As I said,  you're confusing me with someone who isn't familiar with   
   >>> reverse engineered SERE tactics adapted of cyberspace a/k/a Torture   
   >>> with euphemistic names like LART and/or Enhanced Interrogation   
   >>> Techniques.   
   >>   
   >>Not at all.  The one who is confused is you.  The use of SERE tactics   
   >>presumes there is a detainee in physical custody.  This is a usenet   
   >>discussion, and you're not a detainee.   Furthermore, you wouldn't   
   >>qualify as someone upon whom the use of SERE tactics would   
   >>be appropriate.  SERE tactics are reserved for detainees having   
   >>high-value knowledge.   
   >>   
   >>>> Second, you don't qualify as someone upon whom   
   >>>> interrogation techniques should be used.  They are   
   >>>> reserved for subjects with high-value knowledge.   
   >>>   
   >>> You're are confusing me with someone buys into the shittola   
   >>> America's criminal overworld shovels.   
   >>   
   >>Not at all.  The one who is confused is you.  You confuse   
   >>yourself with someone of importance.   
   >>   
   >>>> Congratulations.  You've self-applied the techniques of blissful   
   >>>> ignorance.   
   >>>   
   >>> As I said,  you are confusing me with someone who isn't familiar with   
   >>> reverse engineered SERE tactics aka torture aka EIT.   
   >>   
   >>As I've said, SERE tactics are not applicable to a usenet discussion,   
   >>and you are not qualified for their use.   
   >>   
   >>> Either, discuss the disgusting animal known as Stanley A McChrystal   
   >>> who disgraced America for the past 25 + years. or, I'll assume you're   
   >>> an animal too and killfile your cannabalistic arse.   
   >>   
   >>Stanley McChrystal is a distinguished American military man.   You,   
   >>on the other hand, are deluded, among other things.   
   >>   
   >>Killfile all you want.   Killfiles are for cowards and morons   
   >>and losers like you who can't deal with facts.   Nothing new   
   >>there.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   > Don't worry Linda doesn't killfile anyone, her paranoia won't let her   
   > use killfiles.   
   >   
   > Killfiles and filters are useful, they lower the background noise,   
   > bringing out the information or conversations you want to follow and   
   > observe and take part in on Usenet. I have several people, mostly   
   > spammers and a few others, filtered as marked read. here and in a few   
   > other places. Not cowardice, but a decision just to ignore the   
   > blithering idiots and fools. Sort of like ignoring a crying baby or   
   > misbehaving child in a store.   
   >   
   > Linda is almost fun to watch, she is one of the failures in America   
   > which allows its mentally defective people to wander the streets in   
   > non-productive lives, only to be preyed upon by the vultures of the   
   > world.   
   >   
   > Linda is convinced of a widespread secret conspiracy (how and a   
   > secret be wide spread) that the world it out to get her, This   
   > abnormal fear drives her to seek more and more information to justify   
   > her paranoia and fear.   
   >   
   > Linda dreams and creates ideas which has no basis in reality and   
   > tries to force real life events and actions into her highly warped   
   > framework. One day a simple lawsuit will bring her fantasy world   
   > crumbling down around her when she calls the wrong group of people   
   > Pedophile, and find she doesn't have fact one to support her in a   
   > court of law.   
   >   
   > A declaration of 'Non Compos Mentis' will not save Linda's meager   
   > assets from a judgement.   
   >   
   > I have urged her all along to seek mental help. I even suggested a   
   > Formosa Finding, but she argued that she had no mental problems. So a   
   > finding was not found.   
   >   
   > She sees anyone that points out her problem as a predator, and she is   
   > willing to play the role of victim. Pity, such a educated person   
   > putting her ability to such a waste.   
      
   Thanks for you insights, Bob.   
   I gotta wonder why there isn't a separate ng devoted to Linda Gore.   
   She seems very popular on usenet.   
   I doubt she'll ever get into conventional psychiatric treatment.   
   She considers herself indomitable.   
      
   http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/2c0e20f3e7f575dd?hl=en   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)