7f32e716
XPost: misc.health.alternative, misc.legal, sci.med
XPost: alt.government.abuse
From: fafa@fafafa.org
Linda wrote:
> On Jun 27, 9:36 am, "Al Grimes" wrote:
>> Bob Officer" wrote in message
>> news:t4i9265bnqj9ka8ee1usoam0vf13iop3ud@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 05:08:22 -0400, in misc.health.alternative, "Al
>>> Grimes" wrote:
>>>> Linda wrote:
>>>>> On Jun 24, 3:00 pm, "Al Grimes" wrote:
>>>>>> Linda wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> BTW... your own Senator Harry Reid supports
>>>>>>>>>>> the appointment of General Petraeus to take over
>>>>>>>>>>> the job of fired General McChrystal.
>>>>>>>>>> WTF is your beef with Petraeus???
>>>>>>>>>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>>>>>>>>> Don't have one.
>>>>>>>>> Then, why are you interrogating me about Petraeus---
>>>>>>>> I haven't asked you a single question about Petraeus.
>>>>>>>> I said your own Senator Reid supports Petraeus
>>>>>>>> to replace McChrystal, and I predicted you would
>>>>>>>> find fault with Petraeus in due time.
>>>>>>> You have me confused with those who are unfamiliar with
>>>>>>> Enhanced Interrogation Techniques you are employing.
>>>>>> First, interrogation requires the antecedent condition of having
>>>>>> physical custody of a detainee. That condition isn't present
>>>>>> in this usenet discussion.
>>>>> As I said, you're confusing me with someone who isn't familiar with
>>>>> reverse engineered SERE tactics adapted of cyberspace a/k/a Torture
>>>>> with euphemistic names like LART and/or Enhanced Interrogation
>>>>> Techniques.
>>>> Not at all. The one who is confused is you. The use of SERE tactics
>>>> presumes there is a detainee in physical custody. This is a usenet
>>>> discussion, and you're not a detainee. Furthermore, you wouldn't
>>>> qualify as someone upon whom the use of SERE tactics would
>>>> be appropriate. SERE tactics are reserved for detainees having
>>>> high-value knowledge.
>>>>>> Second, you don't qualify as someone upon whom
>>>>>> interrogation techniques should be used. They are
>>>>>> reserved for subjects with high-value knowledge.
>>>>> You're are confusing me with someone buys into the shittola
>>>>> America's criminal overworld shovels.
>>>> Not at all. The one who is confused is you. You confuse
>>>> yourself with someone of importance.
>>>>>> Congratulations. You've self-applied the techniques of blissful
>>>>>> ignorance.
>>>>> As I said, you are confusing me with someone who isn't familiar with
>>>>> reverse engineered SERE tactics aka torture aka EIT.
>>>> As I've said, SERE tactics are not applicable to a usenet discussion,
>>>> and you are not qualified for their use.
>>>>> Either, discuss the disgusting animal known as Stanley A McChrystal
>>>>> who disgraced America for the past 25 + years. or, I'll assume you're
>>>>> an animal too and killfile your cannabalistic arse.
>>>> Stanley McChrystal is a distinguished American military man. You,
>>>> on the other hand, are deluded, among other things.
>>>> Killfile all you want. Killfiles are for cowards and morons
>>>> and losers like you who can't deal with facts. Nothing new
>>>> there.
>>>>
>>> Don't worry Linda doesn't killfile anyone, her paranoia won't let her
>>> use killfiles.
>>> Killfiles and filters are useful, they lower the background noise,
>>> bringing out the information or conversations you want to follow and
>>> observe and take part in on Usenet. I have several people, mostly
>>> spammers and a few others, filtered as marked read. here and in a few
>>> other places. Not cowardice, but a decision just to ignore the
>>> blithering idiots and fools. Sort of like ignoring a crying baby or
>>> misbehaving child in a store.
>>> Linda is almost fun to watch, she is one of the failures in America
>>> which allows its mentally defective people to wander the streets in
>>> non-productive lives, only to be preyed upon by the vultures of the
>>> world.
>>> Linda is convinced of a widespread secret conspiracy (how and a
>>> secret be wide spread) that the world it out to get her, This
>>> abnormal fear drives her to seek more and more information to justify
>>> her paranoia and fear.
>>> Linda dreams and creates ideas which has no basis in reality and
>>> tries to force real life events and actions into her highly warped
>>> framework. One day a simple lawsuit will bring her fantasy world
>>> crumbling down around her when she calls the wrong group of people
>>> Pedophile, and find she doesn't have fact one to support her in a
>>> court of law.
>>> A declaration of 'Non Compos Mentis' will not save Linda's meager
>>> assets from a judgement.
>>> I have urged her all along to seek mental help. I even suggested a
>>> Formosa Finding, but she argued that she had no mental problems. So a
>>> finding was not found.
>>> She sees anyone that points out her problem as a predator, and she is
>>> willing to play the role of victim. Pity, such a educated person
>>> putting her ability to such a waste.
>> I gotta wonder why there isn't a separate ng devoted to Linda Gore.
>
> WTF?
Sounds like a good idea to me.
> No one has ever told meglomaniacs like "Bob" to shove their Pedo-
> loving propaganda where the sun doesn't shine without "Bob" and his
> Pedo Pals and their Pedo-Loving Kiddie spooks creating a usenet ng
> named something like alt.Lindagore.Die.Die,Die.
Whatever.
> However, as I've advised you numerous times, it's a piece of cake
> for long term sociopaths/amental patients like David Bartholomew
> Brown to create usenet ngs about whatever topics which mentally
> ill types like me wish to discuss, so why don't you assume the onus
> of responsibility for your sadistic desire to create yet another
> defamatory usenet ng about yours truly, David Bartholomew Brown???
Who is David Bartholomew Brown?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
