b114df39   
   XPost: misc.health.alternative, misc.legal, sci.med   
   XPost: alt.government.abuse   
   From: fafa@fafafa.org   
      
   "Linda wrote:   
   > On Jun 27, 3:39 pm, "Al Grimes"  wrote:   
   >> Linda wrote:   
   >>> On Jun 27, 9:36 am, "Al Grimes"  wrote:   
   >>>> Bob Officer"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:t4i9265bnqj9ka8ee1usoam0vf13iop3ud@4ax.com...   
   >>>>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 05:08:22 -0400, in misc.health.alternative, "Al   
   >>>>> Grimes"  wrote:   
   >>>>>> Linda wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Jun 24, 3:00 pm, "Al Grimes"  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> Linda wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> BTW... your own Senator Harry Reid supports   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> the appointment of General Petraeus to take over   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> the job of fired General McChrystal.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> WTF is your beef with Petraeus???   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Don't have one.   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Then, why are you interrogating me about Petraeus---   
   >>>>>>>>>> I haven't asked you a single question about Petraeus.   
   >>>>>>>>>> I said your own Senator Reid supports Petraeus   
   >>>>>>>>>> to replace McChrystal, and I predicted you would   
   >>>>>>>>>> find fault with Petraeus in due time.   
   >>>>>>>>> You have me confused with those who are unfamiliar with   
   >>>>>>>>> Enhanced Interrogation Techniques you are employing.   
   >>>>>>>> First, interrogation requires the antecedent condition of having   
   >>>>>>>> physical custody of a detainee.   That condition isn't present   
   >>>>>>>> in this usenet discussion.   
   >>>>>>> As I said,  you're confusing me with someone who isn't familiar with   
   >>>>>>> reverse engineered SERE tactics adapted of cyberspace a/k/a Torture   
   >>>>>>> with euphemistic names like LART and/or Enhanced Interrogation   
   >>>>>>> Techniques.   
   >>>>>> Not at all.  The one who is confused is you.  The use of SERE tactics   
   >>>>>> presumes there is a detainee in physical custody.  This is a usenet   
   >>>>>> discussion, and you're not a detainee.   Furthermore, you wouldn't   
   >>>>>> qualify as someone upon whom the use of SERE tactics would   
   >>>>>> be appropriate.  SERE tactics are reserved for detainees having   
   >>>>>> high-value knowledge.   
   >>>>>>>> Second, you don't qualify as someone upon whom   
   >>>>>>>> interrogation techniques should be used.  They are   
   >>>>>>>> reserved for subjects with high-value knowledge.   
   >>>>>>> You're are confusing me with someone buys into the shittola   
   >>>>>>> America's criminal overworld shovels.   
   >>>>>> Not at all.  The one who is confused is you.  You confuse   
   >>>>>> yourself with someone of importance.   
   >>>>>>>> Congratulations.  You've self-applied the techniques of blissful   
   >>>>>>>> ignorance.   
   >>>>>>> As I said,  you are confusing me with someone who isn't familiar   
   >>>>>>> with   
   >>>>>>> reverse engineered SERE tactics aka torture aka EIT.   
   >>>>>> As I've said, SERE tactics are not applicable to a usenet discussion,   
   >>>>>> and you are not qualified for their use.   
   >>>>>>> Either, discuss the disgusting animal known as Stanley A McChrystal   
   >>>>>>> who disgraced America for the past 25 + years. or, I'll assume   
   >>>>>>> you're   
   >>>>>>> an animal too and killfile your cannabalistic arse.   
   >>>>>> Stanley McChrystal is a distinguished American military man.   You,   
   >>>>>> on the other hand, are deluded, among other things.   
   >>>>>> Killfile all you want.   Killfiles are for cowards and morons   
   >>>>>> and losers like you who can't deal with facts.   Nothing new   
   >>>>>> there.   
   >>>>>>    
   >>>>> Don't worry Linda doesn't killfile anyone, her paranoia won't let her   
   >>>>> use killfiles.   
   >>>>> Killfiles and filters are useful, they lower the background noise,   
   >>>>> bringing out the information or conversations you want to follow and   
   >>>>> observe and take part in on Usenet. I have several people, mostly   
   >>>>> spammers and a few others, filtered as marked read. here and in a few   
   >>>>> other places. Not cowardice, but a decision just to ignore the   
   >>>>> blithering idiots and fools. Sort of like ignoring a crying baby or   
   >>>>> misbehaving child in a store.   
   >>>>> Linda is almost fun to watch, she is one of the failures in America   
   >>>>> which allows its mentally defective people to wander the streets in   
   >>>>> non-productive lives, only to be preyed upon by the vultures of the   
   >>>>> world.   
   >>>>> Linda is convinced of a widespread secret conspiracy (how and a   
   >>>>> secret be wide spread) that the world it out to get her, This   
   >>>>> abnormal fear drives her to seek more and more information to justify   
   >>>>> her paranoia and fear.   
   >>>>> Linda dreams and creates ideas which has no basis in reality and   
   >>>>> tries to force real life events and actions into her highly warped   
   >>>>> framework. One day a simple lawsuit will bring her fantasy world   
   >>>>> crumbling down around her when she calls the wrong group of people   
   >>>>> Pedophile, and find she doesn't have fact one to support her in a   
   >>>>> court of law.   
   >>>>> A declaration of 'Non Compos Mentis' will not save Linda's meager   
   >>>>> assets from a judgement.   
   >>>>> I have urged her all along to seek mental help. I even suggested a   
   >>>>> Formosa Finding, but she argued that she had no mental problems. So a   
   >>>>> finding was not found.   
   >>>>> She sees anyone that points out her problem as a predator, and she is   
   >>>>> willing to play the role of victim. Pity, such a educated person   
   >>>>> putting her ability to such a waste.   
   >>>> I gotta wonder why there isn't a separate ng devoted to Linda Gore.   
   >>> WTF?   
   >> Sounds like a good idea to me.   
   >>   
   >>> No one has ever told meglomaniacs like "Bob" to shove their Pedo-   
   >>> loving propaganda where the sun doesn't shine without "Bob" and his   
   >>> Pedo Pals and their Pedo-Loving Kiddie spooks creating a usenet ng   
   >>> named something like alt.Lindagore.Die.Die,Die.   
   >> Whatever.   
   >>   
   >>> However,  as I've advised you numerous times,  it's a piece of cake   
   >>> for long term sociopaths/amental patients like David Bartholomew   
   >>> Brown  to create usenet ngs  about whatever topics which mentally   
   >>> ill types like me wish to discuss, so why don't you assume the onus   
   >>> of responsibility for your sadistic desire to create yet another   
   >>> defamatory usenet ng about yours truly, David Bartholomew Brown???   
   >> Who is David Bartholomew Brown?   
   >   
   > Quit evading the issue, which is the ease with which mentally   
   > deranged/sociopathic denizens like yourself can create usenet   
   > forums like alt.LindaGore.die.die.die   
   > just as easily as "Bob Officer" and/or   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)