Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.psychology.psychotherapy    |    Practice of psychotherapy    |    54,659 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 54,001 of 54,659    |
|    George Orwell to Linda    |
|    Re: "Iceman" gets 13 years in a Federal     |
|    06 Sep 10 19:04:50    |
      From: nobody@mixmaster.it              On 9/6/2010 2:32 AM, Linda wrote:       > George Orwell wrote:       >> Linda Gore wrote:       >>       >>> The right to freedom of association which includes       >>> a correlative right to non-association is an unalienable       >>> right.       >>       >> a right to non-association does not include a right to       >> demand others stop replying to your posts.       >       > My unalienable right to association includes a right       > to non-association with whomever misuses ICS in pursuit       > of unwanted communications with yours truly              the right of someone to reply to something you post in       a public forum trumps whatever rights you imagine yourself       having to determine misuse/unwanted communications.              > Furthermore, both the Legislature of Nevada and the       > United States Congress have re-affirmed that my       > right to association inherently includes a correlative       > right to non-association              it does not override the right of others to reply to       things you post in public forums.              > a form of abusive communications known as gaslighting              your own communications within public forums have become       known as gasbagging because you are full of hot air,       perceiving wrongs where none exist and never providing       proof of your allegations and nor support for your       positions.              >> your only remedy is to apply filters and/or discontinue       >> reading this forum.       >       > Bull              if it was bull, you'd have cited case law to the contrary.              > Per 47 U.S.C. 223, it's illegal for Americans to misuse       > ICS in pursuit of unwanted communications with yours       > truly              47 U.S.C. 223 says NOTHING to prohibit the right of others       to reply to things you post in public forums.              > A Cease and Desist Notice serves the dual purpose of       > apprising those who Offend The Violence Against Womens       > Act aka 47 USC 223 that yours truly has received the       > abusive, harassing, threatening, or annoying       > communications              neither a cease/decise notice nor VAWA operate to prohibit       communications in a public forum, particularly when they're       posted in reply to communications you initiate in those       forums.              > 47 U.S.C. 223, a federal law, which states as follows:       > "Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be       > used to originate telecommunications or other types of       > communications that are transmitted by the Internet...       > with the intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass       > any person... shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned       > not more than two years, or both."              then grow a set and take it to a United States Attorney.       bitching and moaning about it here won't make it go away.       your interpretation of law impresses none of your persecutors.       do let us know how it turns out for you.              -)                                   Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this       non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real       reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an       di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system       Per maggiori informazioni |For more info        https://www.mixmaster.it              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca