XPost: misc.health.alternative, misc.legal, alt.government.abuse   
   From: compuelf@gmail.com   
      
   At one time, not so long ago, "carole"    
   wrote:   
      
   >I don't really understand what Linda is trying to say.   
   >Isn't she saying that she has an unalienable right to not respond to a post?   
      
        No.  Linda is claiming that people do not have the right to reply   
   to her posts if she doesn't want them to do so.   
      
   >   
   >That's the way I read it anyway and have to agree with Linda --but I suspect   
   >there might be something I'm missing here.   
   >So what is it and preferably without the putdowns for my non-comprehension.   
      
        Linda believes she can post whatever she wants.  I agree with her   
   on this.   
        She also believes the law prohibits people from replying legally   
   if she doesn't want them to reply.  I hope no one would agree with   
   that.   
      
   --   
   Amor tussisque non celantur   
        -- Ovid   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)