Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.psychology.psychotherapy    |    Practice of psychotherapy    |    54,659 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 54,270 of 54,659    |
|    Dale to All    |
|    Re: "scientific" philosophy?    |
|    29 Aug 13 01:11:10    |
      XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, sci.med.psychobiology, alt.psychoactives       XPost: bionet.neuroscience       From: invalid@invalid.invalid              On 08/28/2013 11:51 PM, % wrote:       > Dale wrote:       >> On 08/28/2013 08:42 PM, % wrote:       >>> Dale wrote:       >>>> On 08/28/2013 08:19 PM, % wrote:       >>>>> Dale wrote:       >>>>>> the word science comes from the Latin, scientia, "knowing"       >>>>>>       >>>>>> the "scientific" process does not lead to "knowing", it leads to       >>>>>> better guesses       >>>>>>       >>>>>> the "scientific" process is as follows:       >>>>>>       >>>>>> 1) hypothesis (any conjecture including theology, etc.)       >>>>>>       >>>>>> 2) theory is a testable hypothesis, not necessarily now or when ,       >>>>>> just testable       >>>>>>       >>>>>> 3) a founded theory is one who has observational or experimental       >>>>>> findings       >>>>>> NO WHERE does the idea of truth or "knowing" come into play       >>>>>>       >>>>>> applies equally to theology       >>>>>>       >>>>>> another reason I am a solipsist       >>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemological_solipsism       >>>>>>       >>>>>> I think the "scientific" community should stop using the words       >>>>>> "science" and "scientific process" and replace it with "PROCESS OF       >>>>>> INQUIRY", because they are misusing the root word "scientia"       >>>>>>       >>>>>> the best thing going, just over stated, and not stated properly       >>>>>> according to the process       >>>>>>       >>>>>> anyone ought to be introduced to "scientific" philosophy before       >>>>>> ANY "science"       >>>>>       >>>>> update thunderbird       >>>>       >>>> why?       >>>       >>> you'll look more intelligent       >>       >> I'll wait until my OS distribution updates its repository       >>       >> that is more intelligent than relying on various sources for       >> dependencies, etc.       >       > update thunderbird              no, for the reasons stated above              --       Dale              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca