XPost: sci.med, sci.med.psychobiology, alt.religion.scientology   
   XPost: alt.flame.psychiatry   
   From: dale20111942yllek@hushmail.com   
      
   I won't preach about the 1987 market market sell off, it led to a   
   progressive candidate being elected, Clinton   
      
   Clinton followed up with a 33% market   
      
   the only way economics is going to work is to accept supply and demand   
   in all aspects, that is capitalism and strife and it fulfils individualism   
      
   Marx said the value of money is the labor that produced it, you need to   
   apply supply and demand to labor   
      
   if you paid the jobs that people want less (less demand) more money   
      
   and paid the jobs people want more (high demand) less money   
      
   the establishment supply side model would work and the establishment   
   could evolve progressively because the work would be valued as much as   
   the money and Mark's theory would be fulfilled   
      
   a better supply and demand model would mean more prosperity, and peace   
   for desperate people because there would be more wealth to share with   
   the desperate   
      
   skill would follow because the low skilled employees would not want   
   something they could not do (lower demand)   
      
   responsibility would follow because the content would not want it (low   
   demand)   
      
   I think this means that the demand side and capitalism and true economic   
   libertarianism would be fulfilled too   
      
   I never had enough money to be in the stock market, but there seems to   
   be a pattern of sell-offs when establishment candidates get in, working   
   people with pensions in the market can trade out of the sell-off as fast   
   and lose hard earned money, I think there needs to be more respect for   
   hard work (coal miners, etc.)   
      
   --   
   Dale   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)