XPost: alt.usenet.kooks, alt.atheism, alt.fan.karl-malden.nose   
   XPost: alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk   
   From: skeet@invalid.invalid   
      
   On Wed, 06 Jan 2016 15:50:51 -0500, Dale  wrote:   
      
   >the current kook cabal fails in its purpose for three reasons   
   >   
   >1) kooks need guided, for the enjoyment of the peanut gallery, the sanity of   
   >the kook, and the purpose of the real cabal   
      
   Someone guided you over here.   
   >   
   >2) the kook cabal is a peanut gallery of the real cabal, ISC.ORG, and   
   >currently has expectations of more than peanuts, rendering them kooks   
   >themselves   
      
   "says the"   
   >   
   >3) kooks need more space to culture themselves, I recommend an alternative   
   >to ISC.ORG, not a replacement but USENET providers selling group ownership   
   >and selling hosting of group moderation for those groups   
      
   Huh?   
   >   
   >first I will define a kook, a kook is an individualist seeking affirmation   
   >in the anarcho-communistic reality of the cosmos, most often manifest on   
   >USENET by nym-shifting into a discussion with himself   
      
   Now that was good.   
   >   
   >any individual found affirming himself as defined above deserves a non-vote   
   >designation as a novice kook by any peanut gallery member by choice of   
   >himself alone, and the official peanut gallery databasing thereof by any   
   >peanut gallery database whose database rules are his own   
      
   You should be in politics.   
   >   
   >kook databasing by the real cabal intrudes upon the peanut gallery   
   >relationship, the real cabal deals only with abusers   
      
   Tell Fakey that.   
   >   
   >when a kook becomes an abuser it is a dealing of the real cabal to intrude   
   >upon real life matters, for instance USENET/internet account cancellations,   
   >henceforth defined as "real cabal work"   
      
   Netkkkops are pussys.   
   >   
   >if the real cabal expects the peanut gallery to do real cabal work for   
   >peanuts, the real cabal needs reminded of the anarcho-communistic nature of   
   >the cosmos and that a promotion to real cabal membership need be extended to   
   >the kook cabaler for such task   
   >   
   >if a kook cabaler finds himself doing real cabal work, he must immediately   
   >remind himself of the anarcho-communistic nature of the cosmos   
   >   
   >secondly I will not fully define guiding a kook, that would leave out the   
   >fun and already known by such such forms of cabal as Freemasons, Illuminati,   
   >and such can also be abstracted or extended from other current kook USENET   
   >dealings   
   >   
   >I will say one thing, a kook does not necessarily have to hit rock bottom,   
   >once he sees rock bottom the ranking begins   
      
      
   I hate to say it, but most here would think this was written by a   
   kook.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)