XPost: alt.atheism, alt.fan.karl-malden.nose, alt.usenet.kooks   
   From: greghall@yacht_master.fake   
      
   On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 01:07:41 -0800, "Checkmate, DoW #1"  wrote:   
      
      
   >It truly is.  The  atheists can't prove there isn't a Creator, and the   
   >believers can't prove there is.  Agnosticism is truly the only rational   
   >conclusion that anyone can come to.  I'd like to think there's a   
   >Creator, but if there is, I have to conclude that he doesn't wish to   
   >make his presence known.  To assume that there's a benevolent god just   
   >waiting to give us an eternal reward or eternal damnation, is just   
   >preposterous.  What would be the point of creating a person, then   
   >subjecting him to painful and never-ending torture?  What kind of   
   >eternal and heavenly reward wouldn't eventually get boring?  When I die,   
   >I'll be quite content to just no longer exist, and eventually be   
   >assimilated back into the earth from where we all came.  I have no   
   >desire to play again... here, or anywhere else.   
      
   LOL! Being an agnostic is as stupid as being an atheist.   
      
   Both idiotic groups deny themselves, via there arrogance,   
   any chance at all of an afterlife. There can be no rational   
   argument that to take a stance that negates your chances   
   is anything but a stupid decision.   
      
   --   
   Sir Gregory Hall, Esq.   
      
   "It is my erudite opinion that a man   
   should not mince words just to spare   
   the sensibilities of the ignorant or   
   the thin-skinned."   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)