35e893d1   
   d3b1f51c   
   XPost: sci.med.psychobiology, sci.med, misc.health.alternative   
   XPost: sci.psychology.misc   
   From: dalton.nfld@gmail.com   
      
   In article   
   <0001HW.2446655E00A9F08770000715A2CF@news.eternal-september.org>,   
    David Dalton  wrote:   
      
   > On Apr 10, 2020, David Dalton wrote   
   > (in   
   > article):   
   >   
   > > Near the end of the Recent Changes section of my   
   > > Salmon on the Thorns web page I describe my theory of   
   > > eight sexual harmonics (which I previously, dating back   
   > > to the summer of 1997, called my four orientation theory).   
   > > The latest theory takes into account transgendered   
   > > and multispirit (who I define differently from   
   > > transgendered, as having more than one harmonic)   
   > > individuals.   
   > >   
   > > For the theists on here, currently I consider my top   
   > > deity God, defined as the all-governing someone, to be   
   > > non-anthropomorphic and non-gendered and refer to my   
   > > God as "it". However I am considering switching to   
   > > the view that my God has all eight sexual harmonics   
   > > and is optimally sexually compatible with everyone. :-)   
   >   
   > and can be identified with by everyone.   
   >   
   > Here is a brief summary of the eight harmonics theory for those   
   > who, like me, are reluctant to click on links in a Usenet newsgroup   
   > post, especially http rather than https:   
   >   
   > I have a theory of four orientations (purestraight, gay/lesbian, bisexual   
   > by nature, and fourth orientation compatible only with bisexual by   
   > nature of the opposite gender) and two spiritual genders, so effectively   
   > eight harmonics (1M, 2M, 3M, 4M, 1F, 2F, 3F, 4F). However one   
   > must also be careful to watch for transgender cases (e.g. 1MT would   
   > be spiritually purestraight male in a female body) and multispirit   
   > individuals, which I define not as transgender but as individuals   
   > with more than one harmonic, generally equal number of male   
   > and female harmonics, and usually two-spirit, e.g. 3F/2MT, but   
   > I did come across one four-spirit individual, 1M/2M/1FT/2FT,   
   > compatible with everyone other than 4F and 4M, so far, and a   
   > 3M/3FT or 3F/3MT would be at least partially compatible with   
   > everybody, and if there was an eight-spirit individual they would   
   > be optimally compatible with everyone, as would a 1M/1F/3M/3F.   
   >   
   > When I say bisexual by nature I mean someone who feels   
   > sexual attraction to both genders, but can be honestly either   
   > bisexual, straight, celibate, or gay/lesbian by lifestyle choice.   
   > When I say partially compatible I mean less likely to   
   > stick, so a 1M is optimally compatible with a 1F but   
   > only partially compatible with a 3F, and I think also   
   > that a 3F is only partially compatible with a 3M but   
   > is optimally compatible with a 4M, 3F, or 2F.   
   >   
   > I base my theory partly on my own sexual attractions (I think   
   > I am 4M) but I also used it, with at least one confirmed 1M/3FT   
   > result, when I thought I had a matchmaking siddhi (paranormal   
   > ability) from late March 8 to early March 20, 2019, which   
   > I hope will return someday. When I say above that I came   
   > across a 1M/2M/1FT/2FT, that was using my ability on a   
   > picture and it has not yet been confirmed. And through   
   > what I call assisted shaktipat I have been trying to pass   
   > on the ability to at least a million individuals worldwide,   
   > who should benefit from my theory. But if not, the theory   
   > should be able to be researched and applied through surveys.   
   > The confusing part is that many who are bisexual by nature   
   > are straight by lifestyle choice, and some gay/lesbian (sexually   
   > attracted to just the same gender) are dishonestly (although   
   > unfortunately forced in some cases) trying to be bisexual or straight.   
   >   
   > I do not believe there are asexuals, though a 4M who has had   
   > no experience yet with 3F might think that he is.   
      
   A 4M would be asexual with respect to 1M, 1F, 2M, 2F, 3M, 4M, 4F   
   but not with respect to 3F, but would be with respect to a   
   2F pretending to be a 3F, and also with respect to a 3MT.   
      
   And, as should be obvious from my above statements,   
   a 4F who has had no experience yet with a 3M might think   
   that she is asexual.  Also some gays and some lesbians   
   might claim to be asexual, and are certainly asexual   
   with respect to the opposite gender.  And some people   
   might be low in some hormones and could benefit from   
   hormone supplementation.   
      
   A 4F would be asexual with respect to 1M, 1F, 2M, 2F, 3F, 4M, 4F   
   but not with respect to 3M, but would be with respect to a   
   2M pretending to be a 3M, and also with respect to a 3FT.   
      
   --   
   David Dalton dalton@nfld.com http://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)   
   http://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)   
   "And the cart is on a wheel/And the wheel is on a hill/And the   
   hill is shifting sand/And inside these laws we stand" (Ferron)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)