Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.skeptic    |    Skeptics discussing pseudo-science    |    95,770 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 93,853 of 95,770    |
|    JTEM to Dawn Flood    |
|    Re: Step-1: Explain how global warming i    |
|    10 Sep 25 18:11:03    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism       XPost: alt.politics.democrats       From: jtem01@gmail.com              On 9/10/25 4:28 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:              > On 9/8/2025 8:06 PM, JTEM wrote:       >> There's a pattern here: You're an idiot.              > Yep              So circling back to the beginning: WHY would a warmer earth       be worse than the alternative?              You do know that stagnation is impossible. That, the climate       is never going to remain the same. That, even within the       Holocene -- which you don't even know what it is -- the       climate has fluctuated a great deal, easily more so than the       scariest of the scary Gwobull Warbling scenarios.              Right? You DO know this. Right?              So why would warmer be better than the alternative, when       the alternative literally spell death for many millions if       not billions?                            --       https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca