Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.skeptic    |    Skeptics discussing pseudo-science    |    95,808 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 93,856 of 95,808    |
|    Dawn Flood to JTEM    |
|    Re: Step-1: Explain how global warming i    |
|    10 Sep 25 18:37:12    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism       XPost: alt.politics.democrats       From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com              On 9/10/2025 5:11 PM, JTEM wrote:       > On 9/10/25 4:28 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:       >       >> On 9/8/2025 8:06 PM, JTEM wrote:       >>> There's a pattern here: You're an idiot.       >       >> Yep       >       > So circling back to the beginning: WHY would a warmer earth       > be worse than the alternative?       >       > You do know that stagnation is impossible. That, the climate       > is never going to remain the same. That, even within the       > Holocene -- which you don't even know what it is -- the       > climate has fluctuated a great deal, easily more so than the       > scariest of the scary Gwobull Warbling scenarios.       >       > Right? You DO know this. Right?       >       > So why would warmer be better than the alternative, when       > the alternative literally spell death for many millions if       > not billions?              It is unreasonable not to take the IPCC models at least as being a       serious possibility. Over a century ago, the physical chemist Svante       Arrhenius (a Nobel laureate in chemistry) did the back-of-the-envelope       calculation:              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svante_Arrhenius              His value for a doubling of CO2 was "5–6 degrees Celsius" increase in       global temperatures:              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_climate_change_science              You can view the latest numbers here:              https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/              It's hard for me to imagine what another 4 or 5 degree increase would be       like. Remember, we're mammals, and it just takes a day or two of       temperatures greater than 50C to kill lots of living, breathing things.              Dawn              P.S. Thank you (and, I say this with sincerity) for being polite by at       least not calling people (such as myself) names, but still, it would be       nicer if you could be at least a little more respectful towards others'       positions.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca