XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 9/10/2025 10:57 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   > On 9/10/25 7:37 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >   
   >> It is unreasonable not to take the IPCC models at least as being a   
   >> serious possibility.   
   >   
   > Which model? Because there's been model after model, prediction after   
   > prediction for at least 40 years, and not one has ever come close   
   > to getting it right. In science, in real science when predictions are   
   > FALSIFIED the hypothesis is discarded. Gwobull Warbling isn't real   
   > science though, so no matter how often it is falsified it always   
   > remains true.   
   >   
      
   Do you have a citation for this?  Either way, have a look at this:   
      
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hockey_stick_graph_(global_temperature)   
      
    From our perspective, only physical causes are at work here (and with   
   respect to anything & everything), and so, those who are living a   
   century from now will have a definitive answer to this (and many other)   
   questions.   
      
   Dawn   
      
   P.S.  Nota bene:  The Universe doesn't give a shit.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)