XPost: alt.paranormal, alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian   
   From: f00@0f0.00f   
      
   None wrote:   
   > On Sep 12, 2025, jojo wrote   
   > (Message-ID:<7eda1708-e6d3-9729-9571-07b6d26f6447@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):   
   >   
   >> None wrote:   
   >>> On Sep 12, 2025, jojo wrote   
   >>> (Message-ID:<06a0238b-feb9-9555-dd59-2b9bffd6e3a0@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):   
   >>>   
   >>>> Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>>>> On 9/12/2025 11:43 AM, jojo wrote:   
   >>>>>> None wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote   
   >>>>>>> (Message-ID: <10a1e6t$3jm3q$2@dont-email.me>):   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 9/12/2025 7:45 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> None wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>> news:10a081v$366mu$1@dont-email.me:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote   
   >>>>>>>>>> (Message-ID: ):   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> None wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>>>> news:109vbc8$2tbin$1@dont-email.me:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> (Message-ID: ):   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> news:rKAwQ.12261$7F4e.8283@fx05.ams4:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:109tfa4$29gbi$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To sum-up, paleoanthropology is a valid science, because,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Major universities exist which offer doctoral   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> degrees in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) The US National Academy of Sciences has admitted   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropologists to its ranks.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Peer-reviewed research journals exist for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Few, if any, scientists dispute the fact that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology is a valid science.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In spite of all that you say above, it is noted that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are at a complete loss of words when I ask   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you to tell us about any specific paleo-anthropological   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> discovery that shows that they have enlightened   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> us about ~anything~...in your own words.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> And you are a "complete loss of words"   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> to tell us the age of the earth, or even   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> us your opinion of it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> The earth as you know it was not until it was called   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> earth on the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> 3rd day of this realm. The planets stars, etc were not   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> until the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> 4th day of this realm. All this occurred around 6,000   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> years ago. In   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> literal time, not figurative nor theoretical.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Why 6,000?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> How do you determine that date?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> What date? I mentioned time approximate.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> OK, "time approximate"   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Why 6000 years?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> What happened then?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And are their so called ""discoveries"" built upon   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> scientific method, or are they built upon fantasy?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those who want the truth do not accept stories that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are built upon fantasy.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Modern Christian: Someone who believes   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> in dragons, unicorns, talking snakes and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> transmutation (all mentioned in the Bible)   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> but accuses those citing scientific data   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> of "indulging in fantasies".   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Then I do not fit your daffynition.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Scientific data only recounts what is reversed   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> engineered, and from   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> that understanding, some try to create variations based   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> on the same   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> things that always existed in the time of man, reshape,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> and reuse,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> and most generally it all contaminates the earth and its   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> environment.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> What other data is there to   
   >>>>>>>>>>> measure time but scientific data?   
   >>>>>>>>>>> The universe expands at a known   
   >>>>>>>>>>> rate, the continents move at a   
   >>>>>>>>>>> known rate, starlight reaches our   
   >>>>>>>>>>> eyes at a known rate. If those   
   >>>>>>>>>>> known rates are wrong what rates   
   >>>>>>>>>>> are right?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> If the continents moved at a known rate then there would be no   
   >>>>>>>>>> earthquakes. All volcanos would erupt and known cycles and   
   >>>>>>>>>> explosive   
   >>>>>>>>>> rates.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> If such massive errors are made then what credibility does   
   >>>>>>>>>> the rest of   
   >>>>>>>>>> your statement have.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Science has recently recognized another light form, one   
   >>>>>>>>>> that was   
   >>>>>>>>>> spoken of near 5,000 years ago + or - and they have yet to   
   >>>>>>>>>> determine   
   >>>>>>>>>> its parameters.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Where was this "spoken of" 5000 years ago?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Oh, the memories of my fundamentalist Christian childhood! Of   
   >>>>>>>> course,   
   >>>>>>>> my childhood occurred back in the 1980s, which, someday, may   
   >>>>>>>> become   
   >>>>>>>> known as the end of the "Information Dark Ages".   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Dawn   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Or more likely the beginning of the end of this age.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> you mean zombie jesus?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> LOL!   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Yeah, Jesus' "imminent return" has been predicted for quite some   
   >>>>> time now!   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictions_and_claims_for_t   
   e_Second_Coming   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Given the Second Law of Thermodynamics and the fact that Jesus'   
   >>>>> remains are in a highly advanced state of decomposition, I think   
   >>>>> that his "return" is quite unlikely!!   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Dawn   
   >>>>   
   >>>> during the cricifiction, the trauma turned jesus into deadpool,   
   >>>> that is the most logical conclusion, he is an x-man.. x-person.   
   >>>   
   >>> Which the event was prophesied of around 1,000 years before that.   
   >>> Through Daniel, Isaiah, King David and others in the OT, but not your   
   >>> conclusion and mockery.   
   >>   
   >> lol btw have you seen the movies? i highly recommend!   
   >   
   > Nope.   
   >   
      
   oh damn you are missing out!! here, i will point them out:   
      
   deadpool - 2016   
   deadpool 2 - 2018   
      
   if you want, i can send you the torrent links.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|