XPost: alt.paranormal, alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian   
   From: none@none.non   
      
   On Sep 13, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote   
   (Message-ID: ):   
      
   > None   wrote in news:10a2ubk$5del$3@dont-email.me:   
   >   
   > > On Sep 12, 2025, Vincent Maycock wrote   
   > > (Message-ID:<4ti9ckpfrip5vckkmrc81ri5iqi25uujj6@4ax.com>):   
   > >   
   > > > On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 17:18:56 -0700, None  wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > > On Sep 12, 2025, Vincent Maycock wrote   
   > > > > (Message-ID:<0oc9ck53j37rmkq3hv6u0m5klmi87d33ib@4ax.com>):   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 12:56:54 -0700, None  wrote:   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > > On Sep 12, 2025, Vincent Maycock wrote   
   > > > > > > (Message-ID:<7qp8ckhb1epb3r83oopm8j4sub39g8ftog@4ax.com>):   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > On Thu, 11 Sep 2025 21:37:20 -0700, None   
   > > > > > > > wrote:   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote   
   > > > > > > >    
   > > > > > > > > > What other data is there to   
   > > > > > > > > > measure time but scientific data?   
   > > > > > > > > > The universe expands at a known   
   > > > > > > > > > rate, the continents move at a   
   > > > > > > > > > known rate, starlight reaches our   
   > > > > > > > > > eyes at a known rate. If those   
   > > > > > > > > > known rates are wrong what rates   
   > > > > > > > > > are right?   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > If the continents moved at a known rate then there would be   
   > > > > > > > > no earthquakes.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > The continents move at about the rate at which fingernails   
   > > > > > > > grow. When two continents (or, more precisely, the tectonic   
   > > > > > > > plates they are a part of) move past each other, sometimes   
   > > > > > > > they get "stuck" on the rough edges of the plates they're   
   > > > > > > > moving past. The pressure to keep moving persists, though,   
   > > > > > > > and finally the two plates break apart from each other. The   
   > > > > > > > energy released when they break apart is an earthquake.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > You just showed that the continents stop moving periodically,   
   > > > > > > and you did not   
   > > > > > > post how much they jumped when an earthquake happens.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Why do you need to know that?   
   > > > >   
   > > > > I don’t, but you do so as not to make foolish declarations.   
   > > >   
   > > > If you didn't need to know, why did you ask the question?   
   > > >   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Yet we often see the   
   > > > > > > evidences of that when the ground opens up and the gap left can   
   > > > > > > be seen in inches to yards. It is inconsistent movement. Many   
   > > > > > > have seen the earth opening and closing in mere moments as is   
   > > > > > > caught on video.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > No, there aren't *that* many earthquakes. The rate of movement   
   > > > > > has been measured with satellites and other such precision   
   > > > > > instruments.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Wow, are you really lacking that much, there are literally 100’s   
   > > > > to 1,000’s of earthquakes every day.   
   > > >   
   > > > Which is not many at any given spot on the earth.   
   > > >   
   > > > > > > > > All volcanos would erupt and known cycles and explosive   
   > > > > > > > > rates.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > No, volcanic eruptions are caused by other factors besides   
   > > > > > > > just the rate at which tectonic plates move.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > So you agreed with, me as well as added more excuses which you   
   > > > > > > could not rationalize.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > LOL! That was the last comment I made, so no more "excuses" could   
   > > > > > have been added.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > However in this case, I was correct and did not make a trolling off   
   > > > > the wall comment like you did.   
   > > > "Trolling off the wall"? What is that?   
   > > >   
   > > > > > > There are designed in limitations to all the realities of this   
   > > > > > > realm. Which   
   > > > > > > the forces of realm must adhere to, and that is why all these   
   > > > > > > natural laws and rules can be identified via the reverse   
   > > > > > > engineering of sciences. Which is why there is order.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Reverse engineering from what to what? How do you know the order   
   > > > > > hasn't always been there?   
   > > > >   
   > > > > That is what I said, the order of this realm was there all along,   
   > > > > ever since it was made.   
   > > >   
   > > > No, I mean without it ever being made.   
   > > >   
   > > > > Do you know anything about reverse engineering?   
   > > >   
   > > > Reverse engineering is when you figure out something's design by   
   > > > studying its function. What does that have to do with the "realm" of   
   > > > science?   
   > > >   
   > > > > > > There is another realm to which none of these laws of order   
   > > > > > > apply. Yet like   
   > > > > > > anhydrous ammonia and water can dwell together in the same   
   > > > > > > physical space, so can the two realms exist. Water being   
   > > > > > > similar to the elements of this realm.   
   > > > > > > If you have any scientific knowledge you should be able to   
   > > > > > > understand that.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > What makes you think there is another realm?   
   > > > >   
   > > > > I do not think it, I know it is real and exists, something you all   
   > > > > deny, yet you are affected by its realty.   
   > > >   
   > > > What makes you think you know it's real? And how does that affect the   
   > > > rest of us?   
   > >   
   > > You have totally lost your trolling touch.   
   > >   
   > > I had to laugh at some of your comments/questions/reasonings.   
   > >   
   > > you are out of phase, even with your own statements. That is sad to   
   > > see. :(   
   >   
   > This is how all arguments with Christians end.   
   > They toss out some claims, you ask intelligent   
   > questions about them, they ignore them, call   
   > you a troll and run away. As with Robert, as   
   > with Andrew, as with this “None”.   
      
   ROTFLOL You consider your questions intelligent? Based upon what? Ego? A   
   point to argue that is based on foolishness?   
      
   You need to learn in order to have knowledge, and then use that knowledge to   
   come up with a well defined question that is not based on foolish assumptions   
   or old wives tales. If you ask a question to learn something so that you are   
   no longer ignorant of that topic, then the answer will stick in your mind   
   forever which may lead to further questions once the door of knowledge was   
   opened to you and you received it.   
      
   If you asked the same question over and over again, it shows that you were   
   unable to comprehend it or willingly denied the answer showing that you asked   
   without the desire to learn, commonly thought of as troll speak.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)