XPost: alt.paranormal, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: none@none.non   
      
   On Sep 13, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote   
   (Message-ID:):   
      
   > None   wrote:   
   > > On Sep 12, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote   
   > > (Message-ID:<415ackd3pmqn6hhtfgtifth1hqhrfn5ogg@4ax.com>):   
   > >   
   > > > None   wrote:   
   > > > > On Sep 12, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote   
   > > > > (Message-ID:<10a2dt4$3cj$1@dont-email.me>):   
   > > >   
   > > > (snip)   
   > > >   
   > > > > > That the origins of all human beings can be traced back to Africa,   
   which   
   > > > > > is where the first modern humans arose.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > That is a total rewrite of Human history, migratory patterns, etc, even   
   > > > > DNA   
   > > > > disproves that thinking. And so does the DNA and genomes of chimps and   
   > > > > humans.   
   > > >   
   > > > You are confusing Bible mythology with human history. The Bible is not   
   > > > a history book.   
   > >   
   > > Your assumptions does not truth make. Assumptions of this sort are based on   
   > > ignorance whether willful or or simple lack of knowledge.   
   >   
   > You didn't know there's a huge body of recorded knowledge that's not   
   > based on the bible at all? Much of it is personal eyewitness info from   
   > persons of known identity, unlike the bible. That's not assumptions, Mr.   
   > Assumer.   
      
   The subject you were replying about was the Bible which you called a   
   mythology out of sheer ignorance.   
   Then you wandered off, shifting the goal posts with yet more assumptions.   
      
   > And that body of knowledge has few points of agreement with the bible.   
      
   Why would it? You really need to go to school and learn about history, and   
   historians.   
   >   
   >   
   > Guess what that means?   
   >   
   > Assume your way out of that.   
      
   R U Kidding me? You are using a bag so wet with water than one more drop of   
   water would rupture the whole thing.   
   >   
   >   
   > > > As for your DNA claims, that's more fiction. You are not a scientist.   
   > >   
   > > A scientist is a generic term, fits a wide variety of disciplines. So your   
   > > reasoning is flawed, plus based on your daffynitions you are not able to   
   > > deny the DNA claims of anyone.   
   >   
   > As Dylan said, you don't have to be a weatherman to know what way the   
   > wind is blowing. That doesn't mean everyone can tell wind direction.   
   >   
   > In your case, you are happily ignorant of the genomes of chimps v.   
   > humans, which frees you to believe assumptions, unburdened by the   
   > responsibility of knowledge.   
      
   There is your ignorance speaking once again. The genome controversy is   
   irrefutable since the debate first started in this century and has totally   
   fallen apart by 2017. I recently read a paper on the subject and the   
   variances, which included the whole picture. Wish I had saved it just of this   
   occasion.   
      
   As Bob drawled, Monkey see, Monkey do, that doesn’t mean everyone can tell   
   the difference between a chimp and some humans, ;) Play it, Sam.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)