XPost: alt.paranormal, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.religion.christian
From: Kenito@Benito.naw
On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 11:45:09 -0700, None wrote:
>On Sep 13, 2025, Kenito Benito wrote
>(Message-ID:):
>
>> On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 03:55:14 +0000, jojo wrote:
>>
>> > Andrew wrote:
>> > > "Dawn Flood" wrote in message news:10a2dt4$3cj$1@dont-email.me...
>> > > > Andrew wrote:
>> > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:
>> > > > > > Andrew wrote:
>> > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:
>> > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:
>> > > > > > > > > paleo-anthropological discovery
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Toss "paleo-anthropological discoveries" into Google AI and
>> > > > > > > > see what you get!
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > You are at a complete loss of words to answer my question.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > But I hope you have a nice day.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Bye!
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Here's the query, "paleo-anthropological discoveries",
>> > > > > > followed by the Google AI response:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thank you Dawn. Now can you point to any specific
>> > > > > paleo-anthropological discovery that shows that they
>> > > > > have enlightened us about any thing.....in your own
>> > > > > words?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > No, but what you have done is, point us to the stories
>> > > > > that they told us that have deceived the gullible masses!
>> > > > >
>> > > > > You cite them as if they were all truth. Not realizinng
>> > > > > that you have been~woefully deceived~along with all
>> > > > > the others!!!
>> > > > >
>> > > > > You folks are so funny, and so 'easily deceived'. Lol!
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Now, can you tell us...> which of their ""discoveries""
>> > > > > have been built upon the scientific method..rather than
>> > > > > upon their fantasies?
>> > > >
>> > > > That the origins of all human beings can be traced back
>> > > > to Africa, which is where the first modern humans arose.
>> > >
>> > > Yes, for man was created there, back in the Garden of Eden.
>> >
>> > you know the one thing about that which makes no sense? it makes
>> > us all super inbred.
>>
>> Something I would like to be explained is why Cain was worried
>> someone would kill him for his murder of Abel. Since there was only
>> Adam, Eve and their children, who were these other people that cause
>> Cain to fear them?
>> Did the God of the Bible create other humans that he placed in
>> other areas? He must have. But if the Bible is to be believed, there
>> was only Adam and Eve until they left the Garden. Then they had
>> children.
>> Maybe some of the kids took off to make their way in the world.
>> There is no mention of this, so anyone who accepts the Bible as valid
>> would dismiss that as a realistic possibility.
>> This also will mean all of Adam's and Eve's children had to
>> procreate with their siblings.
>
>Yes, they did. They were descendants of a perfectly constructed being, and so
>their descendants were from the same stock.
>
So God paused the genetic problems of continued incest?
>They deteriorated genetically over time due to the fall of Adam and as a
>consequence of sin entering this world. That is the results of the Evil one
>who said “I will be as God” and he is the source of all that is bad upon
>this earth, sickness, disease, the flaws of mankind, etc. Even today many
>incestuous relationship produce viable human beings,
The first generation or two may not have any significant
deformities. But by the time we got to where we are, the generic
abnormalities would be so pronounced, we would be lucky to function.
>and also those that have
>had distinctive flaws or maladies will transmit them to their heirs. In the
>cases here in America there are “tribes” of peoples like say the Amish
>and other similar people, who have distinctive characteristics that lead to
>physical maladies, problems, that they cannot escape because in effect they
>show the signs of incestuous effects.
Which supports the idea that humans did not, and cannot,
originate from just one male and one female as the Bible claims.
>The tribes of many peoples who are not
>bound together because of beliefs marry in large part with peoples from other
>tribes, for various reasons, and in do doing introduce ‘fresh blood’ into
>their tribe.
If the Bible is to be believed, this cannot have happened. There
was no "fresh blood" to introduce.
>
>> The negative results in incestuous
>> offspring is well known. So, if the tale were true, we probably
>> wouldn't exist. We would have gotten so bad that humans would have
>> died out.
>
>We all are a result of these things. So much so that certain maladies will
>occur that are distinctive enough that names are given them which are based
>on the genes of a female when impregnated by a male with certain genes the
>result of which a child will be born with certain ‘defects’ the most
>serious or troubling of which have been identified and a geneticist while
>tell you that somewhere in your bloodline that you two were directly related.
>While it may not affect all your future children the probabilities of it are
>there.
I can accept a common ancestor, as you prove you do. But Adam and
Eve will not be one.
>
>For that reason to ensure ones offspring will have no issues is to have a
>provable genealogy, one not based on hearsay or hopes trying to be tied to
>persons of note, as well as a through genetic and DNA search on both parties,
>all cross linked as much as possible to see the possible variants in order to
>ensure a high likelihood on ’normal’ children with intelligence and the
>ability to reason. The cost of doing so is rather high so most people do not
>have the means to do so and they take their chances, especially the young,
>who are the most likely to overlook signs that they should have seen. This is
>why reasonable parents choosing the mates is not a bad thing, unless they do
>so for selfish self promoting reasons.
I didn't, and wouldn't, try to pick my children's partners. They
aren't stupid, and were raised to be able to make their own choices.
So far, this approach has been very successful.
>>
>> If humans managed to somehow continue, we would be so devoid of
>> intelligence, we would barely be able to function as hunter-gatherers.
>
>I’d bet that 90% of the civilized world is currently able to function as a
>hunter-gatherer in these days.
Probably. But that's not the point I was making. You and I
wouldn't be communicating at all because computers wouldn't exist. We
would be too busy trying to find food to eat to worry about much else.
>Plus it is obvious given the current chaos
>that is so prevalent these days that many are devoid of intelligence.
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
