home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.skeptic      Skeptics discussing pseudo-science      95,770 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 93,992 of 95,770   
   Andrew to Mitchell Holman   
   Re: Paleo anthropology is NOT a real sci   
   14 Sep 25 10:43:44   
   
   XPost: alt.paranormal, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: andrew.321.remov@usa.net   
      
   "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message news:XnsB35A54E964835629555@69.80.101.19...   
   > "Andrew" wrote:   
   >> "Mitchell Holman" wrote:   
   >>> "Andrew" wrote:   
   >>>> "Mitchell Holman" wrote:   
   >>>>> "Andrew" wrote:   
   >>>>>> "None" wrote:   
   >>>>>>>Andrew wrote   
   >>>>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> > Andrew wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> > > > Andrew wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> > > > > > Andrew wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> > > > > > > paleo-anthropological discovery   
   >>>>>>>> > > > > >   
   >>>>>>>> > > > > > Toss "paleo-anthropological discoveries" into Google   
   >>>>>>>> > > > > > AI and see what you get!   
   >>>>>>>> > > > >   
   >>>>>>>> > > > > You are at a complete loss of words to answer my   
   >>>>>>>> > > > > question.   
   >>>>>>>> > > > >   
   >>>>>>>> > > > > But I hope you have a nice day.   
   >>>>>>>> > > > >   
   >>>>>>>> > > > > Bye!   
   >>>>>>>> > > >   
   >>>>>>>> > > > Here's the query, "paleo-anthropological discoveries",   
   >>>>>>>> > > > followed by the Google AI response:   
   >>>>>>>> > >   
   >>>>>>>> > > Thank you Dawn. Now can you point to any specific   
   >>>>>>>> > > paleo-anthropological discovery that shows that they   
   >>>>>>>> > > have enlightened us about any thing.....in your own   
   >>>>>>>> > > words?   
   >>>>>>>> > >   
   >>>>>>>> > > No, but what you have done is, point us to the stories   
   >>>>>>>> > > that they told us that have deceived the gullible masses!   
   >>>>>>>> > >   
   >>>>>>>> > > You cite them as if they were all truth. Not realizinng   
   >>>>>>>> > > that you have been~woefully deceived~along with all   
   >>>>>>>> > > the others!!!   
   >>>>>>>> > >   
   >>>>>>>> > > You folks are so funny, and so 'easily deceived'. Lol!   
   >>>>>>>> > >   
   >>>>>>>> > > Now, can you tell us...>  which of their ""discoveries""   
   >>>>>>>> > > have been built upon the scientific method..rather than   
   >>>>>>>> > > upon their fantasies?   
   >>>>>>>> >   
   >>>>>>>> > That the origins of all human beings can be traced back   
   >>>>>>>> > to Africa, which is where the first modern humans arose.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Yes, for man was created there, back in the Garden of Eden.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> The location of the garden of eden was at the land of four   
   >>>>>>>  rivers. It was next door to Persia   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Yes, and after the Flood humans came from where the Ark landed.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>     If all humans came from the   
   >>>>> Noah family where did the different   
   >>>>> races of people come from?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Genetic diversity and geographic isolation.   
   >>>   
   >>>    There is no genetic diversity   
   >>> within a family. They aall share   
   >>> the SAME genes from the SAME sources.   
      
   Genetic diversity happens all the time in   
   populations. You would have known that   
   if you ever studied the work of Mendel.   
      
   That combined with geographic isolation   
   helps us understand why we have different   
   races today.   
      
   >> As years and decades go on, populations   
   >> become isolated from those in other parts   
   >> of the world.   
   >   
   >   
   >>>     But tell us: How could the   
   >>> Noah family reproduce itself   
   >>> without a WHOLE lot of incest   
   >>> going on?   
      
   Those on the Ark were all married.   
      
   >> The same factors as existed with the   
   >> children of Adam.   
   >   
   >     What factors?   
   >   
   >     Incest is still incest.   
   >   
   >> At that time there   
   >> was genetic purity, no defects.   
   >   
   >     1) The Bible doesn't say that.   
      
   Yes it does.   
      
   >     2) Then where did genetic   
   > defects come from?   
      
   Genetic entropy happens.   
      
   >     3) There was no "Cain's wife from   
   > the land of Nod" excuse in the flood   
   > story. Noah's children all had sex   
   > with each other. You ocannot get   
   > around that.   
      
   Why are you so concerned about their   
   personal lives? I suspect you are trying   
   to justify yourself in some things that   
   you have done.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca