home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.skeptic      Skeptics discussing pseudo-science      95,770 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 94,001 of 95,770   
   Dawn Flood to jojo   
   Re: Paleo anthropology is NOT a real sci   
   14 Sep 25 15:40:48   
   
   XPost: alt.paranormal, alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 9/13/2025 9:35 PM, jojo wrote:   
   > Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >> On 9/13/2025 2:09 PM, jojo wrote:   
   >>> jojo wrote:   
   >>>> Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>>>> On 9/12/2025 11:34 PM, jojo wrote:   
   >>>>>> None wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2025, jojo wrote   
   >>>>>>> (Message-ID:<7eda1708-   
   >>>>>>> e6d3-9729-9571-07b6d26f6447@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> None wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2025, jojo wrote   
   >>>>>>>>> (Message-ID:<06a0238b-feb9-9555-   
   >>>>>>>>> dd59-2b9bffd6e3a0@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> On 9/12/2025 11:43 AM, jojo wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> None wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> (Message-ID: <10a1e6t$3jm3q$2@dont-email.me>):   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/12/2025 7:45 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> None   wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:10a081v$366mu$1@dont-email.me:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Message-ID: ):   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> None   wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:109vbc8$2tbin$1@dont-email.me:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Message-ID: ):   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew"  wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:rKAwQ.12261$7F4e.8283@fx05.ams4:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:109tfa4$29gbi$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To sum-up, paleoanthropology is a valid science,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Major universities exist which offer doctoral   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> degrees in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) The US National Academy of Sciences has admitted   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropologists to its ranks.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Peer-reviewed research journals exist for   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Few, if any, scientists dispute the fact that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology is a valid science.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In spite of all that you say above, it is noted that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are at a complete loss of words when I ask   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you to tell us about any specific paleo-anthropological   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discovery that shows that they have enlightened   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us about ~anything~...in your own words.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you are a "complete loss of words"   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to tell us the age of the earth, or even   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us your opinion of it.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The earth as you know it was not until it was called   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> earth on the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3rd day of this realm. The planets stars, etc were not   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4th day of this realm. All this occurred around 6,000   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago. In   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> literal time, not figurative nor theoretical.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why 6,000?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you determine that date?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What date? I mentioned time approximate.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, "time approximate"   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why 6000 years?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What happened then?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And are their so called ""discoveries"" built upon   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scientific method, or are they built upon fantasy?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those who want the truth do not accept stories that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are built upon fantasy.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modern Christian: Someone who believes   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in dragons, unicorns, talking snakes and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transmutation (all mentioned in the Bible)   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but accuses those citing scientific data   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of "indulging in fantasies".   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then I do not fit your daffynition.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scientific data only recounts what is reversed   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> engineered, and from   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that understanding, some try to create variations based   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the same   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things that always existed in the time of man, reshape,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and reuse,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and most generally it all contaminates the earth and its   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environment.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What other data is there to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> measure time but scientific data?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The universe expands at a known   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rate, the continents move at a   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> known rate, starlight reaches our   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eyes at a known rate. If those   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> known rates are wrong what rates   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are right?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If the continents moved at a known rate then there would   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be no   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> earthquakes. All volcanos would erupt and known cycles and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> explosive   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rates.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If such massive errors are made then what credibility does   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the rest of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your statement have.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Science has recently recognized another light form, one   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that was   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spoken of near 5,000 years ago + or - and they have yet to   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> determine   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its parameters.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where was this "spoken of" 5000 years ago?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, the memories of my fundamentalist Christian childhood! Of   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> course,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> my childhood occurred back in the 1980s, which, someday, may   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> become   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> known as the end of the "Information Dark Ages".   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawn   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Or more likely the beginning of the end of this age.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> you mean zombie jesus?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> LOL!   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca