XPost: alt.paranormal, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy
XPost: alt.religion.christian
From: none@none.non
On Sep 14, 2025, Kenito Benito wrote
(Message-ID:<1l6dckllqg05gg8uf0eg71jt8920j4vfs3@4ax.com>):
> On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 15:22:01 -0700, None wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > > > How did the animals get to Australia? Madagascar? The
> > > > > Philippines? Japan?
> > > >
> > > > This will surprise you but those answers are all in the Bible.
> > >
> > > Exact where? Please be specific.
> >
> > I can go through a very extensive list in order to he thorough, but if you
> > really want to see proof of it you have to read it for yourself. Reason?
You
> > do not accept anything I say or write as proof of anything.
> >
> > To do so I would have to re-research it all, to generate a list as I do not
> > keep physical records of what I have learned in the past, as the Lord
> > consistently gives me new insights none of which conflict with was is
known,
> > but adds increases in the knowledge and understandings of what went before.
> >
> > Given that much of what I post you is not remembered, nor honored enough to
> > be remembered of what value would be all this added info that you are
> > already opposed to and discredited even before you see it since is all
'myths'.
>
> That is a LONG way to go about admitting the answers are not in
> the Bible.
That is a pure supposition and not based on reality.
To argue against something that has been scrutinized for several thousand
years, And deny all that it says without a great deal of study and research
causes one to wonder about credibility.
When one discusses things from a negative standpoint without knowledge of the
source it sets the tone of an argument, not understanding.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
