XPost: alt.paranormal, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: none@none.non   
      
   On Sep 14, 2025, Attila wrote   
   (Message-ID:):   
      
   > On Sun, 14 Sep 2025 17:24:02 -0700, None  in   
   > alt.atheism with message-id<10a7mb2$1jtsc$3@dont-email.me>   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   > > On Sep 14, 2025, Attila wrote   
   > > (Message-ID:):   
   > >   
   > > > On Sun, 14 Sep 2025 00:24:45 -0700, None  in   
   > > > alt.atheism with message-id<10a5qjt$12pq4$3@dont-email.me>   
   > > > wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Attila wrote   
   > > > > (Message-ID:<0nkcckpiflo6noteugq1artknp6u10c85f@4ax.com>):   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 15:22:01 -0700, None  in   
   > > > > > alt.atheism with message-id<10a4qq9$ok2p$1@dont-email.me>   
   > > > > > wrote:   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Attila wrote   
   > > > > > > (Message-ID:<78kbcktur2nd3o3tkt2dhsbpeln5qnura7@4ax.com>):   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 11:58:56 -0700, None  in   
   > > > > > > > alt.atheism with message-id<10a4etg$krjv$2@dont-email.me>   
   > > > > > > > wrote:   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Attila wrote   
   > > > > > > > > (Message-ID:<19nackp64c7m0g727n3qil1hs4b4dq9tvq@4ax.com>):   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 03:22:03 -0700, "Andrew"   
   > > > > > > > > >   in alt.atheism with message-id   
   > > > > > > > > >   wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > "None" wrote in message news:10a2v2e$5del$5@   
   ont-email.me...   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > paleo-anthropological discovery   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Toss "paleo-anthropological discoveries"   
   into Google AI and   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you get!   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are at a complete loss of words to answer   
   my question.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But I hope you have a nice day.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye!   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's the query, "paleo-anthropological   
   discoveries", followed   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > by   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Google AI response:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you Dawn. Now can you point to any specific   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > paleo-anthropological discovery that shows that   
   they   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have enlightened us about any thing.....in your own   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > words?   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, but what you have done is, point us to the   
   stories   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that they told us that have deceived the gullible   
   masses!   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You cite them as if they were all truth. Not   
   realizinng   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that you have been~woefully deceived~along with all   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the others!!!   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You folks are so funny, and so 'easily deceived'.   
   Lol!   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, can you tell us...>  which of their   
   ""discoveries""   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have been built upon the scientific method..rather   
   than   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > upon their fantasies?   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > That the origins of all human beings can be traced   
   back   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > to Africa, which is where the first modern humans   
   arose.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, for man was created there, back in the Garden of   
   Eden.   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > The location of the garden of eden was at the land of   
   four   
   > > > > > > > > > > > rivers. It was next door to Persia   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Yes, and after the Flood humans came from where the Ark   
   > > > > > > > > > > landed.   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > Where did all that water go?   
   > > > > > > > > > How did the animals get to Australia? Madagascar? The   
   > > > > > > > > > Philippines? Japan?   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > This will surprise you but those answers are all in the Bible.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > Exact where? Please be specific.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > I can go through a very extensive list in order to he thorough,   
   but if   
   > > > > > > you   
   > > > > > > really want to see proof of it you have to read it for yourself.   
   Reason?   
   > > > > > > You   
   > > > > > > do not accept anything I say or write as proof of anything.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > No, it is because I do not accept anything in that document   
   > > > > > as being true unless the specific item is verified by   
   > > > > > unambiguous, unrelated, verifiable and credible evidence. So   
   > > > > > far only a few physical locations and historical figured   
   > > > > > qualify. A very few.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Then nothing you ever say regarding it has credence.   
   > > >   
   > > > All I ever say is that it lacks verification. If you   
   > > > disagree state why. In detail, not generalities.   
   > > >   
   > > > > Since you lack the   
   > > > > knowledge of it as well as the understanding/ Also given as the City of   
   > > > > David   
   > > > > has been proven and verifiably so as well as the Temple at shiloh. Then   
   > > > > everything surround it must be true as well.   
   > > >   
   > > > The City of David is the ancient core of Jerusalem. As I   
   > > > have stated some physical sites have been verified.   
   > > >   
   > > > Shiloh has been positively identified with modern Khirbet   
   > > > Seilun, a tell known in Modern Hebrew as Tel Shiloh. It is   
   > > > located 31 kilometres (19 mi) north of Jerusalem, in the   
   > > > West Bank, to the west of the modern Israeli settlement town   
   > > > of Shilo and to the north of the Palestinian town of Turmus   
   > > > Ayya. Another physical site that seems verified.   
   > > >   
   > > > Such as what "around it"? The site alone says nothing about   
   > > > what may or may not have occurred there.   
   > >   
   > > To keep it simple, the site of the temple at Shiloh as I said before does   
   > > have many signs of what had occurred there. That it was a Jewish Temple,   
   and   
   > > their practices were far different that any other religion of its Day.   
   > >   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)