XPost: alt.paranormal, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: none@none.non   
      
   On Sep 14, 2025, Attila wrote   
   (Message-ID:):   
      
   > On Sun, 14 Sep 2025 16:38:24 -0700, None  in   
   > alt.atheism with message-id<10a7jlg$1ic7a$7@dont-email.me>   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   > > On Sep 14, 2025, Attila wrote   
   > > (Message-ID:):   
   > >   
   > > > On Sun, 14 Sep 2025 00:28:04 -0700, None  in   
   > > > alt.atheism with message-id<10a5qq4$12pq4$4@dont-email.me>   
   > > > wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Attila wrote   
   > > > > (Message-ID:):   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 21:07:52 -0700, "Andrew"   
   > > > > >   in alt.atheism with message-id   
   > > > > >   wrote:   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > > "Mitchell Holman" wrote in message   
   > > > > > > news:XnsB359D30E5B5EB629555@69.80.101.20...   
   > > > > > > > "Andrew" wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > "Mitchell Holman" wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > "Andrew" wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > "None" wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Dawn Flood" wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > paleo-anthropological discovery   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Toss "paleo-anthropological discoveries"   
   into Google AI   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and see what you get!   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are at a complete loss of words to answer   
   my question.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But I hope you have a nice day.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bye!   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's the query, "paleo-anthropological   
   discoveries",   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > followed by the Google AI response:   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you Dawn. Now can you point to any specific   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > paleo-anthropological discovery that shows that   
   they   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have enlightened us about any thing.....in your own   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > words?   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, but what you have done is, point us to the   
   stories   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that they told us that have deceived the gullible   
   masses!   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You cite them as if they were all truth. Not   
   realizinng   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that you have been~woefully deceived~along with all   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the others!!!   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You folks are so funny, and so 'easily deceived'.   
   Lol!   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, can you tell us...>  which of their   
   ""discoveries""   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have been built upon the scientific method..rather   
   than   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > > upon their fantasies?   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > That the origins of all human beings can be traced   
   back   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > > to Africa, which is where the first modern humans   
   arose.   
   > > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, for man was created there, back in the Garden of   
   Eden.   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > The location of the garden of eden was at the land of   
   four   
   > > > > > > > > > > > rivers. It was next door to Persia   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Yes, and after the Flood humans came from where the Ark   
   landed.   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > If all humans came from the   
   > > > > > > > > > Noah family where did the different   
   > > > > > > > > > races of people come from?   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Genetic diversity and geographic isolation.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > There is no genetic diversity   
   > > > > > > > within a family. They aall share   
   > > > > > > > the SAME genes from the SAME sources.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > As years and decades go on, populations   
   > > > > > > become isolated from those in other parts   
   > > > > > > of the world.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > Irrelevant. There is still a population of unrelated   
   > > > > > individuals. BTW, DNA analysis will include the part of the   
   > > > > > world your ancestors came from.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > BTW, While a few individuals can technically reproduce, a   
   > > > > > sustainable human population needs a significant number to   
   > > > > > maintain genetic diversity and long-term health, with   
   > > > > > estimates for a healthy, self-sustaining population ranging   
   > > > > > from 160 to 500 or more, depending on factors like genetic   
   > > > > > diversity, technological intervention, and time scale. The   
   > > > > > 50/500 rule, developed for biological populations, suggests   
   > > > > > 50 individuals are needed to avoid inbreeding and 500 for   
   > > > > > long-term evolutionary adaptation, a benchmark that can be   
   > > > > > adjusted for humans with careful genetic management.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Where was there technology 3, 4 or t thousand years ago?   
   > > >   
   > > > What technology was involved?   
   > >   
   > > This is what you said, hence my question.   
   >   
   > My comment was not about technology but about the minimum   
   > number of individuals needed to perpetuate a species.   
   >   
   > Stay on the subject.   
      
   I did according to your definition of all the things that you stated had to   
   be part of the picture.   
   I quoted below the pertinent part I asked you specifically where was there   
   technology thousands of years before. You were the one that pointed out that   
   technology had to be used, I asked where was it,   
      
   It was your assumption that technology had to be a part of it, so if you were   
   correct then you would know what technology was used.   
      
   If you can’t cash the check, then say so.   
   >   
   >   
   > > *************************************   
   > > > > > depending on factors like genetic   
   > > > > > diversity, technological intervention, and time scale. The   
   > > > > > 50/500 rule, developed for biological populations,   
   > > > > > *************************************   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > That is where inbreeding and genetic   
   > > > > > > > diseases come from.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > But tell us: How could the   
   > > > > > > > Noah family reproduce itself   
   > > > > > > > without a WHOLE lot of incest   
   > > > > > > > going on?   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > The same factors as existed with the   
   > > > > > > children of Adam. At that time there   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)