XPost: alt.paranormal, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: none@none.non   
      
   On Sep 15, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote   
   (Message-ID:):   
      
   > None   wrote:   
   > > On Sep 14, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote   
   > > (Message-ID:):   
   > >   
   > > > None   wrote:   
   > > > > On Sep 14, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote   
   > > > > (Message-ID:):   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > Attila  wrote:   
   > > > > > > On Sun, 14 Sep 2025 01:06:13 -0700, Samuel Spade   
   > > > > > >   in alt.atheism with message-id   
   > > > > > >   wrote:   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > None   wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote   
   > > > > > > > > (Message-ID:):   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > None   wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote   
   > > > > > > > > > > (Message-ID:):   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > LOL! It's amazing that here in the 21st century,   
   supposed grown   
   > > > > > > > > > > > adults   
   > > > > > > > > > > > believe in 1-week creation and The Flood. Then they try   
   to convince   
   > > > > > > > > > > > atheists!   
   > > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew &  Robert, you guys are more fun than a barrel of   
   monkeys.   
   > > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Science and history support the days of creations.   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > Okay, I'll bite. I get to deny that, then you cite proof   
   from true,   
   > > > > > > > > > non-looney science and history sources that supports the 6   
   day   
   > > > > > > > > > creation,   
   > > > > > > > > > and you can make me look like a damn fool. Ready?...   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > No Rob, that's false. Science and history do not support the   
   Genesis   
   > > > > > > > > > creation mythology.   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > Waiting...   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > So, Robster, where's the beef? My invitation sits unrequited...   
   all you   
   > > > > > > > have to do is prove science &  history support creation, like   
   you said   
   > > > > > > > it   
   > > > > > > > does, and I will be all humble and humiliated and everything.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > You can do it!   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > > Plant life cannot survive   
   > > > > > > > > > > 24 hours without the Sun.   
   > > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > Also false.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > Then you are not knowledgeable about plant life and the total   
   absence   
   > > > > > > > > of   
   > > > > > > > > Light.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > Are you a biologist now? Any healthy green plant can survive 24   
   hours   
   > > > > > > > of darkness. You could conjure up a solar eclipse that long and   
   prove   
   > > > > > > > it!   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Excuse me - a solar eclipse only lasts a short time and a   
   > > > > > > total eclipse can only last minutes.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > However there have been numerous occasions when the sun was   
   > > > > > > blocked for over a day - such as during some volcano   
   > > > > > > eruptions.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > A magic eclipse, like the one in Luke 23, can last for 3 hours.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > "44 And it was about the sixth hour, and there was a darkness over   
   all   
   > > > > > the earth until the ninth hour. 45 And the sun was darkened, and the   
   > > > > > veil of the temple was rent in the midst."   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Properly translated from greek to todays English it would read "it   
   covered   
   > > > > the land” or a "darkness covered the all the land”   
   > > >   
   > > > Irrelevant. The whole earth, or whole land, was dark from noon to 3pm.   
   > > > Now how do you think that happened?   
   > >   
   > > It is not irrelevant, for the whole earth was not darkened.   
   > >   
   > > As to how it happened you can check if you have the smarts from NASA’s   
   > > website. You know this from jumping in on a reply to Dawn/   
   >   
   > Now you're back to claiming it was a 3 hour eclipse, near the time of a   
   > full moon?   
      
   Nope, and why can’t your read, just more troll speak   
   >   
   >   
   > This boy just doesn't know whether he's coming or going.   
   >   
   > > > So you admit it wasn't a solar eclipse. Did the sun turn off? The   
   > > > "firmament" became opaque? No explanation besides "magic"?   
   > >   
   > > Another false troll comment and insertion. Bye   
   >   
   > What did I tell you before about posting angry?   
      
   There was not one bit of anger there.   
   Trolls are not troubling you just sweep them from under ones feet.   
      
   >   
   >   
   > Wipe those tears and climb back on your soapbox, double down on the   
   > magic eclipses, and sharpen your apologetics.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)