XPost: alt.paranormal, alt.atheism, alt.religion.christian
From: f00@0f0.00f
Dawn Flood wrote:
> On 9/13/2025 9:35 PM, jojo wrote:
>> Dawn Flood wrote:
>>> On 9/13/2025 2:09 PM, jojo wrote:
>>>> jojo wrote:
>>>>> Dawn Flood wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/12/2025 11:34 PM, jojo wrote:
>>>>>>> None wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2025, jojo wrote
>>>>>>>> (Message-ID:<7eda1708-
>>>>>>>> e6d3-9729-9571-07b6d26f6447@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> None wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2025, jojo wrote
>>>>>>>>>> (Message-ID:<06a0238b-feb9-9555-
>>>>>>>>>> dd59-2b9bffd6e3a0@shinku.aoyagi.konjou>):
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Dawn Flood wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/12/2025 11:43 AM, jojo wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> None wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 12, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Message-ID: <10a1e6t$3jm3q$2@dont-email.me>):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9/12/2025 7:45 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> None wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:10a081v$366mu$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Message-ID:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> None wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:109vbc8$2tbin$1@dont-email.me:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 11, 2025, Mitchell Holman wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Message-ID:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Andrew" wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:rKAwQ.12261$7F4e.8283@fx05.ams4:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Dawn Flood" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:109tfa4$29gbi$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To sum-up, paleoanthropology is a valid
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> science, because,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) Major universities exist which offer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doctoral
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> degrees in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) The US National Academy of Sciences has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> admitted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropologists to its ranks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3) Peer-reviewed research journals exist for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4) Few, if any, scientists dispute the fact
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleoanthropology is a valid science.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In spite of all that you say above, it is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> noted that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you are at a complete loss of words when I ask
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you to tell us about any specific
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> paleo-anthropological
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> discovery that shows that they have enlightened
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us about ~anything~...in your own words.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you are a "complete loss of words"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to tell us the age of the earth, or even
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> us your opinion of it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The earth as you know it was not until it was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> called
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> earth on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3rd day of this realm. The planets stars, etc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4th day of this realm. All this occurred
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> around 6,000
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> years ago. In
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> literal time, not figurative nor theoretical.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why 6,000?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you determine that date?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What date? I mentioned time approximate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, "time approximate"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why 6000 years?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What happened then?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And are their so called ""discoveries""
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> built upon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scientific method, or are they built upon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fantasy?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those who want the truth do not accept
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stories that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are built upon fantasy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Modern Christian: Someone who believes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in dragons, unicorns, talking snakes and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transmutation (all mentioned in the Bible)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but accuses those citing scientific data
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of "indulging in fantasies".
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Then I do not fit your daffynition.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Scientific data only recounts what is reversed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> engineered, and from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that understanding, some try to create
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> variations based
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the same
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> things that always existed in the time of man,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reshape,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and reuse,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and most generally it all contaminates the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> earth and its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environment.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What other data is there to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> measure time but scientific data?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The universe expands at a known
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rate, the continents move at a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> known rate, starlight reaches our
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eyes at a known rate. If those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> known rates are wrong what rates
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If the continents moved at a known rate then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there would be no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> earthquakes. All volcanos would erupt and known
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cycles and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> explosive
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rates.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If such massive errors are made then what
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> credibility does
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the rest of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your statement have.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Science has recently recognized another light
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> form, one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spoken of near 5,000 years ago + or - and they
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have yet to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> determine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its parameters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
