XPost: alt.paranormal, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: none@none.non   
      
   On Sep 14, 2025, Attila wrote   
   (Message-ID:<2l5fck5npd6q2apa35pcgqvl9crqlq1616@4ax.com>):   
      
   > On Sun, 14 Sep 2025 15:47:30 -0700, None  in   
   > alt.atheism with message-id<10a7gm2$1ic7a$2@dont-email.me>   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   > > On Sep 13, 2025, Attila wrote   
   > > (Message-ID:<3klcck123b2m3s7pf740oj6um3tuh1n0ss@4ax.com>):   
   > >   
   > > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2025 22:15:23 -0700, None  in   
   > > > alt.atheism with message-id<10a5j1b$v3bm$6@dont-email.me>   
   > > > wrote:   
   > > >   
   > > > > On Sep 13, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote   
   > > > > (Message-ID:):   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > None   wrote:   
   > > > > > > On Sep 12, 2025, Samuel Spade wrote   
   > > > > > > (Message-ID:<415ackd3pmqn6hhtfgtifth1hqhrfn5ogg@4ax.com>):   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > None   wrote:   
   > > > > > > > > On Sep 12, 2025, Dawn Flood wrote   
   > > > > > > > > (Message-ID:<10a2dt4$3cj$1@dont-email.me>):   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > (snip)   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > > That the origins of all human beings can be traced back to   
   Africa,   
   > > > > > > > > > which   
   > > > > > > > > > is where the first modern humans arose.   
   > > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > > That is a total rewrite of Human history, migratory patterns,   
   etc,   
   > > > > > > > > even   
   > > > > > > > > DNA   
   > > > > > > > > disproves that thinking. And so does the DNA and genomes of   
   chimps and   
   > > > > > > > > humans.   
   > > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > > You are confusing Bible mythology with human history. The Bible   
   is not   
   > > > > > > > a history book.   
   > > > > > >   
   > > > > > > Your assumptions does not truth make. Assumptions of this sort are   
   based   
   > > > > > > on ignorance whether willful or or simple lack of knowledge.   
   > > > > >   
   > > > > > You didn't know there's a huge body of recorded knowledge that's not   
   > > > > > based on the bible at all? Much of it is personal eyewitness info   
   from   
   > > > > > persons of known identity, unlike the bible. That's not assumptions,   
   Mr.   
   > > > > > Assumer.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > The subject you were replying about was the Bible which you called a   
   > > > > mythology out of sheer ignorance.   
   > > >   
   > > > Where is it verified by unambiguous, unrelated, verifiable   
   > > > and credible evidence?   
   > >   
   > > I think you are speaking on another topic. The evidence of his subject is   
   at   
   > > the beginning of his post here.   
   >   
   > No. The only parts of the bible that have been verified are   
   > a few physical locations and the existence of a few   
   > historical figures.   
   >   
   > Nothing about what happened or what anyone did.   
      
   The attack on Israel the destructions of its cities, and or their quick to   
   submit takeovers of cities, as well as the years long siege against   
   Jerusalem, in combination with the remnants of the ramps they built up to the   
   walls of the city, remain to this day, both in the annals of the Bible as   
   well as a carved in stone mural of the events of that day for the king that   
   sought to destroy them all.   
      
   Records in Egypt of the Israelites in the desert. All the various places   
   where scribes of other nations made clay tablets and or writings upon papyri   
   that were done in regards for the NT times.   
      
   The Tower of Babel   
      
   Noahs Ark.   
      
   Evidences of a Global flood.   
      
   The god Molok and the children offered up as sacrifices to it.   
      
   The location of the tomb Jesus was placed in.   
      
   Just a sample to add to the two we recently discussed.   
      
   >   
   >   
   > > >   
   > > >   
   > > > > Then you wandered off, shifting the goal posts with yet more   
   assumptions.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > > And that body of knowledge has few points of agreement with the   
   bible.   
   > > > >   
   > > > > Why would it? You really need to go to school and learn about history,   
   and   
   > > > > historians.   
   > > >   
   > > > History and historians look for unambiguous, unrelated,   
   > > > verifiable and credible evidence to support their findings.   
   > >   
   > > LOL, then a full 98% + of historical records do not meet your requirements.   
   >   
   > Those accepted by historians do.   
      
   Historians? Then why not the Bible by believers in God?   
      
   Historians are often prejudiced. Shown to be wrong or of a limited   
   perspective. Like the burning of Rome.   
      
   History can be confirmed or denied based on physical evidence that gives   
   credence to the social history of not.   
   >   
   >   
   > > Which BTW the resulting product of that is that you have no historical   
   > > records to bank on. > comment.   
   >   
   > There are historical documents in many places.   
      
   Yes, Including in America. On cliffs and in caves. Way stones that point out   
   were to go, etc.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)