XPost: alt.paranormal, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 9/17/2025 5:52 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   > On 9/17/25 5:21 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >   
   >> JTEM cannot testify in any court of law, state or   
   >   
   > What I often find as the most convincing argument IN FAVOR OF a   
   > premise would be the so called "Arguments" against it. And if   
   > you read the so called "Studies" that refute the Mungo Man   
   > mtDNA findings, the link to the Chromosome 11 insert, one can   
   > only conclude that they got it absolutely right the first time.   
   >   
   > For starters, they never even tested most of the DNA, in the   
   > so called "Study" that pretends to refute the findings. They   
   > merely state that they were unable to extract any DNA from the   
   > remains.   
   >   
   > Secondly, they claim the initial results were caused by   
   > contamination. You know, that people carrying the mutation in   
   > their nuclear DNA -- Chromosome 11 -- contaminated the Mungo   
   > Man remains. But that's impossible because they are not the   
   > same at all.   
   >   
   > Look. The so called "Molecular Clock" is bullshit. Mutations   
   > do happen, the more time between any two samples the more   
   > mutations we can expect to see but it's far from "Clock like."   
   >   
   > Anyway, a very long time separated Mungo Man from the mutation   
   > that caused some mtDNA to leap on over to Chromosome 11. And   
   > over the very long period of time mutations continued to   
   > accumulate within Mungo Man and members of his population. So   
   > the result is detectable differences between the mtDNA found   
   > in the Mungo Man remains and the mtDNA copied over to Chromosome   
   > 11 and carried by BILLIONS of people living today.   
   >   
   > In short:  The Out of Africa purity scheme is just plain wrong.   
   >   
   > It's false.   
   >   
   > WE CAN FIND THE MUTATION INSIDE OF AFRICA!  Which means there   
   > had to be a migration FROM Eurasia and into Africa!   
   >   
   > Who migrated?  A group SIGNIFICANTLY older than any so called   
   > "Eve" in the Out of Africa purity nonsense...   
   >   
      
   I find your lack of coauthors disturbing.   
      
   Dawn   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)