Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.skeptic    |    Skeptics discussing pseudo-science    |    95,770 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 94,235 of 95,770    |
|    Dawn Flood to JTEM    |
|    Re: What is the best evidence for or aga    |
|    21 Sep 25 11:46:45    |
      XPost: alt.paranormal, alt.atheism, alt.alien.research       XPost: alt.alien.visitors       From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com              On 9/20/2025 3:47 PM, JTEM wrote:       >       > Let's not play any games where people pretend that by UFOs       > (UAVs, etc) they DON'T mean "Aliens from another planet."       >       > You do.       >       > Okay, so what is the best evidence FOR and AGAINST the       > idea of UFOs buzzing the earth?       >       > AGAINST:       >       > The best evidence against it, for me, is that the narrative       > sucks. It's on the level of folklore or even fairytales.       > Claims aren't just inconsistent but competing.       >       > WE'RE OVER SATURATED!       >       > We don't just have aliens we have dozens and in some cases       > HUNDREDS of alien species, and their various craft, all       > buzzing the earth and all evading detection while at the       > same time exposing themselves on a constant basis...       >       > Then there's the fact that THE MILITARY is the very source       > of UFO folklore.       >       > Modern UFO folklore begins with Kennith Arnold and his       > sighting of "Flying Saucers." BUT, and this is uber       > important, he was lured to his place of sighting by the       > military! They had claimed that a plane crashed and       > offered a hefty reward to any pilots who overflew the area       > and found it. THAT is why Kennith Arnold was even there!       >       > So the UFO narrative sucks out loud. It's an incoherent       > mess that is self contradictory even during it's rare       > moments of clarity.       >                     In my opinion, interstellar space travel is, now and forever, a       technological impossibility. No matter how advanced a civilization       becomes, F = ma will still be true, and so, getting from one place to       another (an interstellar transfer orbit) requires energy, lots of it.       The bigger the rocket, the more energy, the bigger the rocket, ..., if       you get my point here.              This is probably also the reason that human beings will never set foot       on the planet Mars.              Dawn              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca