XPost: alt.paranormal, alt.atheism, alt.conspiracy   
   XPost: alt.religion.christian   
   From: Kenito@Benito.naw   
      
   On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:11:56 -0700, None  wrote:   
      
   >On Sep 23, 2025, Kenito Benito wrote   
   >(Message-ID:):   
   >   
   >> On Mon, 22 Sep 2025 10:09:55 -0700, None  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> > On Sep 22, 2025, Kenito Benito wrote   
   >> > (Message-ID:):   
   >> >   
   >> > > On Sun, 21 Sep 2025 13:28:13 -0400, JTEM  wrote:   
   >> > >   
   >> > > > On 9/21/25 7:27 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:   
   >> > > > > On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 15:45:12 -0400, JTEM  wrote:   
   >> > > > >   
   >> > > > > > On 9/19/25 4:16 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:   
   >> > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 07:00:33 -0400, JTEM    
   wrote:   
   >> > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > Kenito Benito wrote:   
   >> > > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > > On Wed, 17 Sep 2025 16:15:56 -0400, JTEM    
   wrote:   
   >> > > > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > > > On 9/17/25 4:29 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:   
   >> > > > > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 16 Sep 2025 23:53:37 -0400, JTEM<   
   tem01@gmail.com>  wrote:   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > > > > > On 9/11/25 4:17 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:   
   >> > > > > > > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Why do you keep hitting "Reply?"   
   >> > > > > > > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > > > > > For the same reason you likely do. To continue the   
   conversation.   
   >> > > > > > > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > > > > > It's not   
   >> > > > > > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > > > > It is the very reason I keep hitting "Reply." Lying   
   will not   
   >> > > > > > > > > > > change this TRUTH.   
   >> > > > > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > > > Narcissism is very ugly, and you keep proving this fact.   
   >> > > > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > > Even if we accept your claim that you're a narcissist as   
   valid,   
   >> > > > > > > > > what does it have to do with your claim that the reason I   
   keep   
   >> > > > > > > > > hitting   
   >> > > > > > > > > "Reply" is for a reason other than the one I cite? It looks   
   like   
   >> > > > > > > > > you're trying to divert from the reality that you have been   
   proved   
   >> > > > > > > > > wrong on EVERY count you've raised.   
   >> > > > > > > > > I think you will admit this, by default, in your reply by   
   trying   
   >> > > > > > > > > to divert. Or you will run away from the truth.   
   >> > > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > > How many of you are there?   
   >> > > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > > Your admitting that you are trying to divert from the reality   
   >> > > > > > > that you have been proved wrong on EVERY count you've raised is   
   noted   
   >> > > > > > > and appreciated. You will continue to admit this TRUTH because I   
   >> > > > > > > command you to do so.   
   >> > > > > > > I will thank you for doing as I command without question or   
   pause   
   >> > > > > > > when you do so.   
   >> > > > > >   
   >> > > > > > It's not about me.   
   >> > > > >   
   >> > > > > Thank you for doing as I command without question or pause. I   
   >> > > > > command that you continue. And you will because I am commanding you   
   to   
   >> > > > > do so. You are unable to resist following my commands.   
   >> > > >   
   >> > > > It's not about me.   
   >> > >   
   >> > > Ibid.   
   >> >   
   >> > How come you never declare how much you bid for anything?   
   >>   
   >> I do hope you're making a weak joke. It's difficult to get past   
   >> eighth grade without knowing about ibidem.   
   >   
   >It is not often used word, generally used out of extreme laziness by pompous   
   >people.   
   >   
      
        It is a common term used when a cite has already been presented.   
      
   >Yes, I made light of it,   
      
        No, you expressed your lack of understanding/education. Nothing   
   more.   
      
   >for the very reason I just gave. saying that at an   
   >auction and they would toss you out on your ear, ;)   
   >   
      
        Another lame joke.   
        Not to suggest my jokes are any better.   
      
   >I can also assure you that in grammar school that word was never used,   
      
        It was when I was young. And each of my children learned of it   
   when being taught the different means of citing sources. Each learned   
   in eighth grade. I first learned of it outside of school when I was   
   around 12. But I was 13 or 14 when it was taught to me, and the rest   
   of the class, in school.   
      
   >unless, perhaps in some religious school.   
      
        It is very probable it is taught in religious schools as well.   
   But I never attended one. My children attended public school.   
      
   >I would love to see you in a   
   >teachers quiz or test answer some of their questions with that answer.   
      
        You surely did see such questions, though I wasn't involved. It's   
   not as if the education system made special curriculum for me and/or   
   my children, forcing others in their classes to learn as well.   
        It is far more probable that you either forgot what you were   
   taught, or you were in a special class for those with learning   
   disabilities and not taught. It's not possible for me to know which is   
   the case, though your posts make me think it's the former.   
      
   --   
   Kenito Benito   
   Strategic Writer,   
   Psychotronic World Dominator.   
   And FEMA camp counselor.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)