XPost: alt.paranormal, soc.history.ancient, alt.atheism   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 10/1/25 7:11 PM, Trevor wrote:   
   > JTEM wrote:   
   >   
   >> If this is too much for you than I have really easy shortcut.   
   >> It's nowhere near as accurate as other approaches but it is   
   >> a few thousand percent more accurate than merely believing   
   >> the media. And that is to just assume the opposite.   
      
   > So you are always lying.   
      
   No. I genuinely recommend the above.   
      
   With most "News" paid content -- it's not reporting information   
   it's disseminating a narrative -- and if you can't analyze a   
   claim, then just believe the opposite. You really will be wrong   
   a lot, doing it this way, but you will get it right far more   
   often than you ever could by taking the media at face value.   
      
   Ironically, turn back the clock a generation or more and people   
   would be insulted if you accused them of licking up the media.   
   Now jackasses are offended if you don't obey what Wall Street   
   tells you, through it's media.   
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)