XPost: alt.atheism, alt.paranormal, alt.politics.democrats   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/19/25 5:16 AM, chine.bleu wrote:   
   > Vincent Maycock wrote:   
   >> On Wed, 19 Nov 2025 00:11:32 -0500, JTEM  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 11/18/25 4:02 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> And, that's just fine!  IF what you are claiming is true   
   >>>   
   >>> Wait. You don't know? You're pretending to be informed, you're   
   >>> "Arguing" in defense of a climate narrative and you aren't even   
   >>> aware of the climate basics? That the Holocene is an interglacial,   
   >>> a brief warm spot between two glaciations? This is news to you?   
   >>   
   >> The effects of global warming will become evident before the next ice   
   >> age can affect us.   
      
   > And given the hysteresis of the oceans, if it is then evidently hostile   
   > to h sapiens, it will be too late to change.   
      
   #1.  We wouldn't want to change it. If we could warm the planet that   
   would be a VERY good thing.   
      
   "But it would be different!"   
      
   THAT is the utter insanity of the Gwobull Warbling freaks; thinking   
   that it SHOULD much less COULD remain stagnant.   
      
   The climate is changing and always has and always will. Here in the   
   Quaternary Period, the changes are very large and very rapid, in   
   geological terms, it being an ice age with this glacial/interglacial   
   cycle.   
      
   Stagnation is off the table. It's a fantasy. Worse:  It's a delusion.   
   The climate has not and will not remain the same. So, which is better:   
      
   Warmer or cooler?   
      
   Warmer. Absolutely no question here, a warmer climate is better.   
      
   AND, let's say we geoengineered the planet and managed to STOP the   
   ice age. Let's say mankind will never again fear mile-tall mountains   
   of ice scraping our cities clean off the map. Would that mean cooling   
   off the planet, keeping the climate stagnant or -- now get this --   
   restoring the planet to it's pre ice age WARMER temps?   
      
   I'm just going to throw that one out there and laugh at the Gwobull   
   Warblers for not being able to deal with it...   
      
   But you're right. Even if we pretend that the AGE narrative is real,   
   that the Greta Gospels are truth and there's actual science here, there   
   is literally nothing what so ever we can do. Even if we embark on the   
   worst genocide EVER, killing off more than 7 billion people, we can't   
   stop AGW, assuming the narrative is true. Just from the increase in   
   human population alone, since when the narrative places the start of   
   AGW, CO2 emissions at that time, we exhale more than TWICE AS MUCH CO2   
   as they claim sparked "Warming" in the first place!   
      
   Yes humans exhale CO2.   
      
   Give how much the human population has grown, JUST FROM BREATHING we   
   produce more than twice as much CO2 as what supposedly got AGE started   
   in the first place.   
      
   "Oh no! Quick!  Suffocate the people with the least money, power and   
   responsibility under regressive taxes, while we elite jet around in   
   private planes. Hurry! GWOBULL WARBLING!"   
      
   It's pointless, unless you're a European noble or a billionaire, it's   
   utterly pointless. You suffer, they get richer and more powerful at   
   your expense.   
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)