Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.skeptic    |    Skeptics discussing pseudo-science    |    95,770 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 94,905 of 95,770    |
|    JTEM to Vincent Maycock    |
|    Re: IT'S SO HOT THAT IT'S COLD!!! Heat c    |
|    20 Nov 25 20:55:12    |
      XPost: alt.atheism, alt.paranormal, alt.politics.democrats       XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh       From: jtem01@gmail.com              On 11/20/25 6:24 PM, Vincent Maycock wrote:              > And you snipped a lot more than that.              No you never had any balls.       > What mystery-factor would lead me to choose mainstream science as the       > "right ones" to listen to?              Stupidity. Laziness. A desperate need to be "Seen" as "Right" regardless       of what the correct answer is.              >> So you're saying 1838 is the start       >>       >> Okay, what were CO2 emissions in 1838?              > You don't need that.              No. You do. You believe the Gwobull Warbling narrative that says #1 CO2       is too high, so you have to establish a baseline, what CO2 needs to be,       or needs to be lower than. And #2 none of the "Solutions" put forward       by your narrative make any sense, BECAUSE it's impossible for them to       achieve any stated goal, which is all too clear when you establish how       low CO2 emissions need to go... according to your mythology.              > CO2 levels will tell you what you need to know.              "Too high" can only be established by way of a comparison to some       baseline. That baseline would be CO2 emissions at the point in time       you want to pretend your precious Gwobull Warbling began.              > From the article that you evidently had trouble understanding: it was       > 280 parts per million.              That's impossible because "280 parts per million" isn't talking about       emissions at all. It's speaking of atmospheric concentrations while       your precious Gwobull Warbling narrative is all about human emissions.              NOT the same thing at all!              Secondly, 280 parts per million is pretty low for NATURAL levels with       ZERO human industry.              Back when the Neanderthals ruled during the last interglacial, it was       much warmer, sea level was much higher and CO2 is believed to have       ranged from 270 to 280 parts per million.              Google it, bed wetter.                                          --       https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca