home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.skeptic      Skeptics discussing pseudo-science      95,770 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 94,905 of 95,770   
   JTEM to Vincent Maycock   
   Re: IT'S SO HOT THAT IT'S COLD!!! Heat c   
   20 Nov 25 20:55:12   
   
   XPost: alt.atheism, alt.paranormal, alt.politics.democrats   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 11/20/25 6:24 PM, Vincent Maycock wrote:   
      
   > And you snipped a lot more than that.   
      
   No you never had any balls.   
   > What mystery-factor would lead me to choose mainstream science as the   
   > "right ones" to listen to?   
      
   Stupidity. Laziness. A desperate need to be "Seen" as "Right" regardless   
   of what the correct answer is.   
      
   >> So you're saying 1838 is the start   
   >>   
   >> Okay, what were CO2 emissions in 1838?   
      
   > You don't need that.   
      
   No. You do. You believe the Gwobull Warbling narrative that says #1 CO2   
   is too high, so you have to establish a baseline, what CO2 needs to be,   
   or needs to be lower than. And #2 none of the "Solutions" put forward   
   by your narrative make any sense, BECAUSE it's impossible for them to   
   achieve any stated goal, which is all too clear when you establish how   
   low CO2 emissions need to go... according to your mythology.   
      
   > CO2 levels will tell you what you need to know.   
      
   "Too high" can only be established by way of a comparison to some   
   baseline. That baseline would be CO2 emissions at the point in time   
   you want to pretend your precious Gwobull Warbling began.   
      
   >  From the article that you evidently had trouble understanding:  it was   
   > 280 parts per million.   
      
   That's impossible because "280 parts per million" isn't talking about   
   emissions at all. It's speaking of atmospheric concentrations while   
   your precious Gwobull Warbling narrative is all about human emissions.   
      
   NOT the same thing at all!   
      
   Secondly, 280 parts per million is pretty low for NATURAL levels with   
   ZERO human industry.   
      
   Back when the Neanderthals ruled during the last interglacial, it was   
   much warmer, sea level was much higher and CO2 is believed to have   
   ranged from 270 to 280 parts per million.   
      
   Google it, bed wetter.   
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca