Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.skeptic    |    Skeptics discussing pseudo-science    |    95,770 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 94,939 of 95,770    |
|    JTEM to Dawn Flood    |
|    Re: IT'S SO HOT THAT IT'S COLD!!! Heat c    |
|    26 Nov 25 14:24:04    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism, alt.paranormal       XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh       From: jtem01@gmail.com               Dawn Flood wrote:                     > If what you are claiming is true              Right off the bat: You're not just pretending that the planet is       warming up, you're pushing the AGW narrative, the Greta Gospels:              MAN! MADE! GWOBULL! WARBLING!              So any comparison of time DURING THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION to       another insignificantly earlier period of time DURING THE       INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION is absolute shit. It's a hoax. What you'd       need to do is compare post industrial climate to pre industrial       climate. But you can't do that because then we have the       Medieval Warm Period and the Roman Warm Period, as well as things       like The Little Ice Age proving that your entire premise it       absolute shit. It's a hoax.              But you. say "If what you are claiming it true," which in English       is a confession of not knowing the facts...              So you admit that you believe that the climate all through the Holocene       was stable -- stagnant -- and only saw changes since pretending your       Gwobull Warbling started, though you honestly have no idea WHEN that was       supposed to be and couldn't venture so much as a guess as to what CO2       missions were at the time.              "But it was stable up to that exact point, the climate... whatever that       point was!              So right there we established that you are either batshit crazy of       woefully misinformed. Because the climate has NEVER been stable, not       once, in millions of years... certainly not in the whole of the       Quaternary Period.              AND if climate is NOT stable (and it's not) and there's SUPPOSED       TO BE recognizable fluctuations then an ANAL-ysis of 65 years or even       165 years is utterly WORTHLESS and deceptie.. FAKE SCIENCE. Because       all your ANAL-ysis is doing to pretending to find what we already       know: The climate isn't stagnant.                            --       https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca