home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.skeptic      Skeptics discussing pseudo-science      95,770 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 94,939 of 95,770   
   JTEM to Dawn Flood   
   Re: IT'S SO HOT THAT IT'S COLD!!! Heat c   
   26 Nov 25 14:24:04   
   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism, alt.paranormal   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
     Dawn Flood wrote:   
      
      
   > If what you are claiming is true   
      
   Right off the bat:  You're not just pretending that the planet is   
   warming up, you're pushing the AGW narrative, the Greta Gospels:   
      
   MAN! MADE! GWOBULL! WARBLING!   
      
   So any comparison of time DURING THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION to   
   another insignificantly earlier period of time DURING THE   
   INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION is absolute shit. It's a hoax. What you'd   
   need to do is compare post industrial climate to pre industrial   
   climate. But you can't do that because then we have the   
   Medieval Warm Period and the Roman Warm Period, as well as things   
   like The Little Ice Age proving that your entire premise it   
   absolute shit. It's a hoax.   
      
   But you. say "If what you are claiming it true," which in English   
   is a confession of not knowing the facts...   
      
   So you admit that you believe that the climate all through the Holocene   
   was stable -- stagnant -- and only saw changes since pretending your   
   Gwobull Warbling started, though you honestly have no idea WHEN that was   
   supposed to be and couldn't venture so much as a guess as to what CO2   
   missions were at the time.   
      
   "But it was stable up to that exact point, the climate... whatever that   
   point was!   
      
   So right there we established that you are either batshit crazy of   
   woefully misinformed. Because the climate has NEVER been stable, not   
   once, in millions of years... certainly not in the whole of the   
   Quaternary Period.   
      
   AND if climate is NOT stable (and it's not) and there's SUPPOSED   
   TO BE recognizable fluctuations then an ANAL-ysis of 65 years or even   
   165 years is utterly WORTHLESS and deceptie.. FAKE SCIENCE. Because   
   all your ANAL-ysis is doing to pretending to find what we already   
   know:  The climate isn't stagnant.   
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca