XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   XPost: alt.politics.democrats   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 12/10/2025 12:02 AM, JTEM wrote:   
   > On 12/9/25 11:51 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >   
   >> For an idea to fall into the realm of Science, it has to be testable,   
   >> and you have offered nothing in the way of testability.   
   >   
   > You have it backwards.   
   >   
   > YOU and the Greta Gospels make a claim. That claim includes   
   > predictions. Those predictions are tests. Those predictions   
   > falsified Gwobull Warbling. It has already been falsified   
   > many times over.   
   >   
   > The Maldives are not underwater.   
   >   
   > Glacier National Park still has glaciers.   
   >   
   > The Arctic is not ice free.   
   >   
   > James Hansen, legendary climate scammer, said that NYC's   
   > west side hwy would be underwater by 2009...   
   >   
   > And, again, compare the present interglacial to the last one   
   > and it's cool right now. It's the opposite of warm.   
   >   
   > CO2 was  _Lower_ in the Eemien. Sea level was higher. Temperatures   
   > were higher. Neanderthals ruled Europe, no fossil fuels in sight.   
   >   
   >   
   >   
      
   Yep, certain scientists have been wrong, but that does not necessarily   
   mean that the 100+ climate models out there are all wrong.   
      
   By the way, what is your testable hypothesis?  Are you claiming that   
   anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions have no impact on global   
   temperatures?  How is that a testable hypothesis??  If so, state the   
   null hypothesis that we can test against, and ultimately, reject in   
   favor of your experimental hypothesis.   
      
   Dawn   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)