home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.skeptic      Skeptics discussing pseudo-science      95,770 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 95,106 of 95,770   
   Dr. Rocktor to JTEM   
   Re: Alan "Rich Kid" Baker, Knows EVERYTH   
   10 Dec 25 11:56:00   
   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics   
   XPost: alt.atheism, alt.politics.democrats   
   From: drr@in.valid   
      
   On Sun, 7 Dec 2025 14:03:49 -0500   
   JTEM  wrote:   
      
   > On 12/7/25 12:43 PM, Ken wrote:   
   >    
   > > With such a narrow focus, how can they possibly have any expertise   
   > > on climate?  They would be more knowledgeable if they forgot what   
   > > they've allegedly learned and went back to get liberal arts   
   > > degrees, like poets, businessmen, lawyers or politicians.   We   
   > > should never trust doctors or specialists for the same reason.   
   > > Anyone who specializes in anything has no credibility.     
   >    
   > It's called an "Appeal to Authority," and it's a fallacious argument.   
   >    
   > fal·​la·​cious fə-ˈlā-shəs   
   > Synonyms of fallacious   
   > 1   
   > : embodying a fallacy   
   > a fallacious conclusion   
   > a fallacious argument   
   > 2   
   > : tending to deceive or mislead : delusive   
   > … false and fallacious hopes …—   
   > Conyers Middleton   
   >    
   > Your "Position" would not be acceptable on a high school debating   
   > team, not actually constituting any real "Argument."   
   >    
   > What happens is that stupid and/or dogmatic people have an emotional   
   > need to support/defend a position, but lack the intellect to   
   > challenge ideas presented, deconstruct arguments and verify claims   
   > of fact. So they don't bother. Instead, they engage in a "Fallacious"   
   > argument.   
   >    
   > Gwobull Warbling is a hoax. And just one fact alone is enough for   
   > the emotionally stable to see this fact:  This make pretend "Climate   
   > Science" only ever compares the Holocene to itself, and even then it   
   > only ever compares to closely related points within the post   
   > industrial era to themselves.   
   >    
   > Now you don't know what I just said, much less why that excludes   
   > AGW "Science" from actually being science, but that's what makes you   
   > so funny.   
   >    
   > You're hilarious!   
   >    
   >    
   >    
   >    
   >    
      
   +1   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca