XPost: alt.atheism, soc.history.ancient   
   From: hidefromu@hushmail.com   
      
   On 2026-01-06 11:57 p.m., JTEM wrote:   
   >   
   > https://greekreporter.com/2026/01/07/pottery-mount-ararat-noah-ark-debate/   
   >   
   > "Eew! Eew! Science is wrong! Noah's Ark isn't real!"   
   >   
      
   Nice selective reading, I quote:   
      
   "Road work exposes evidence of early human activity   
      
   Kaya stressed that the pottery does not prove the existence of Noah’s   
   Ark. Instead, he said, it adds archaeological context to a site often   
   discussed through belief rather than evidence. The shards were exposed   
   during road construction near Dogubayazit, close to the boat-shaped   
   mound that has fueled speculation for decades.   
      
   According to researchers, the dating indicates the area was not isolated   
   in antiquity, supporting broader evidence that early communities lived   
   or moved through the Mount Ararat region over extended periods."   
      
   Read that first sentence and comprehend it.   
      
   "Kaya stressed that the pottery does not prove the existence of Noah’s Ark."   
      
      
   --   
   "The dildo of consequence rarely comes lubed"   
   Anonymous   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)