XPost: alt.atheism, soc.history.ancient   
   From: hidefromu@hushmail.com   
      
   On 2026-01-07 11:37 a.m., JTEM wrote:   
   > On 1/7/26 8:52 AM, Idlehands wrote:   
   >> On 2026-01-06 11:57 p.m., JTEM wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> https://greekreporter.com/2026/01/07/pottery-mount-ararat-noah-ark-   
   >>> debate/   
   >>>   
   >>> "Eew! Eew! Science is wrong! Noah's Ark isn't real!"   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Nice selective reading, I quote:   
   >>   
   >> "Road work exposes evidence of early human activity   
   >   
   > Yeah that's proof. If Noah's Ark was historical fact -- which it is,   
   > as this proves -- there would be evidence of human activity and   
   > there is.   
   >   
   > It's called "Science."   
   >   
   > Scientific Hypothesis:  "Noah's Ark was real. The people left behind   
   > pottery."   
   >   
   > Science:  "Oh look! Look!  Here's the pottery our hypothesis predicted!"   
   >   
   > You hate science.   
   >   
      
   "Here is pottery indicating human activity."   
   Scientist   
      
   THIS PROVES THE ARK IS REAL   
   The words of a deranged fundamentalist.   
      
   Why do you hate Christians?   
      
      
      
   --   
   "The dildo of consequence rarely comes lubed"   
   Anonymous   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)