home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   sci.skeptic      Skeptics discussing pseudo-science      95,770 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 95,427 of 95,770   
   JTEM to Mitchell Holman   
   Re: Gwobull Warbling: Follow the money   
   18 Jan 26 12:23:01   
   
   XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 1/17/26 9:33 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:   
      
   >        Why? You will just   
      
   I've explained it before and you are incapable of grasping   
   it but, those of us who aren't emotionally committed to   
   the narrative, we people who mastered nose-breathing; we   
   all grew up in the same world you did.   
      
   We didn't land here from Mars, just last week. We all were   
   born and raised in the same world as you. We were all   
   exposed to the exact same propaganda. We were all weened   
   on the exact same media as you. And with almost ZERO   
   exceptions, we started out just accepting the AGW bullshit.   
      
   "My TV said!!!!"   
      
   But ideas were tested. And failed. Information relating to   
   the narrative but for no honest reason kept separate -- like   
   the entire climate history of the planet prior to the late   
   19th century -- was added to the body of "Evidence," and   
   your precious narrative failed. Your AGW religion was   
   falsified.   
      
   What would falsify your Gwobull Warbling beliefs?   
      
   As far as anyone can see, you base your acceptance of the   
   narrative on the word of perceived authorities.   
      
   That's all.   
      
   No science. You never once deconstructed a single problem,   
   proposed a test... never once mapped a supposed "Solution"   
   to any claimed effect... nothing. You just blindly,   
   obediently lick up anything the media spits out.   
      
   Prove me wrong. I dare you to even try.   
      
      
   I don't think you have the balls. If you were capable of it,   
   why wouldn't you have done it already? Why would you be so   
   emotionally dependent on compliance if you were a free thinker?   
      
   No, you don't have the balls.   
      
   Take this as a challenge.   
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca