XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism   
   From: jtem01@gmail.com   
      
   On 1/18/26 3:26 PM, Attila wrote:   
      
   > It is not necessary to prove you wrong.  It is your   
   > obligation to support what you say.   
      
   Lol!  I did. Many, many, many, many, many times.   
      
   Now you want to pretend that you're "Science Based?"   
      
   Fine. Prove it. Prove YOU are not full of shit.   
      
   Spell out what would falsify Gwobull Warbling for YOU.   
      
   YOU.   
      
   You can't claim that you don't know, not without pleading   
   insanity. So what would YOU need to see to prove YOU   
   wrong?   
      
   > Bertrand Russell   
      
   Wow. You quoted a perceived authority as part of your   
   denial of relying entirely on perceived authority.   
      
   I have to guess that you're trolling, that even you could   
   not have missed the irony? The hypocrisy?   
      
   You've been challenged. And failed.   
      
   Wanna try again or do you admit defeat(ing yourself)?   
      
      
      
   --   
   https://jtem.tumblr.com/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)