Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    sci.skeptic    |    Skeptics discussing pseudo-science    |    95,770 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 95,437 of 95,770    |
|    Dawn Flood to JTEM    |
|    Re: Gwobull Warbling: Follow the money    |
|    19 Jan 26 19:18:28    |
      XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism       From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com              On 1/19/2026 7:55 AM, JTEM wrote:       > On 1/19/26 1:40 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:       >       >> Science is not infallible;       >       > It's not science. In science, when your hypothesis is falsified       > it's discarded. In climate hysterics, you double down.       >       > These aren't just words. I don't make up shit like you do. This       > is how science works, and climate hysterics does not work this       > way. It fails to meet a basic definition of science.       >              Then, let's assume that it has been falsified! So what?! As long as a       scientist is acting in what they believe to be good faith, they have a       moral & legal right to publish their ideas. Never has any court found       any climate scientist to be guilty of fraud, never. And, even if there       is a motive to just make more money, so what?!              And, so, let's assume that what you are saying is completely true! Life       goes on, doesn't it?!              Dawn              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca