XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 1/19/2026 10:05 PM, JTEM wrote:   
   > On 1/19/26 8:18 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 1/19/2026 7:55 AM, JTEM wrote:   
   >   
   >>> It's not science. In science, when your hypothesis is falsified   
   >>> it's discarded. In climate hysterics, you double down.   
   >>>   
   >>> These aren't just words. I don't make up shit like you do. This   
   >>> is how science works, and climate hysterics does not work this   
   >>> way. It fails to meet a basic definition of science.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Then, let's assume   
   >   
   > "Then," what?   
   >   
   > Are you acknowledging that falsifiability is a basic tenant of   
   > science?   
   >   
   > Yes or no?   
   >   
      
   Duh!  But, you have not presented a testable hypothesis, rather, your   
   "it's always natural variability" is not falsifiable.  Here's a testable   
   hypothesis:   
      
   https://nsidc.org/sea-ice-today   
      
   If sea ice would exceed the 1981-2010 median for two consecutive seasons   
   without any major volcanic eruptions (or, even if there were), then the   
   models of anthropogenic climate change are either wrong, or at least   
   fundamentally flawed, for no model would predict such an increase in   
   oceanic temperatures.  In fact, at this point, a single year where the   
   median were exceeded would be extraordinarily unusual!  If such   
   occurred, I would have serious doubts if the IPCC models are even   
   remotely correct.   
      
   Dawn   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)