XPost: alt.global-warming, alt.atheism   
   From: Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com   
      
   On 1/24/2026 1:36 PM, Paul Aubrin wrote:   
   > Le 22/01/2026 à 20:41, Vincent Maycock a écrit :   
   >>> Wikipedia is definitely not a legitimate source since climate models   
   >>> predictions don't match observations.   
   >> Wikipedia is not the only source that accepts the climate models.   
   >   
   > It has been established that climate model computations don't match   
   > observations over extended past periods (40 years). They have been   
   > invalidated.   
   >   
      
   Which ones?  Over 100 exist in the IPCC AR6 Assessment; which ones have   
   been invalidated??   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)